Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Mean monocyte FcR expression in 195 study patients

From: Association between monocyte Fcγ subclass expression and acute coronary syndrome

   FcR I FcR II FcR III
  N Geometric mean (95% CI) p-value Geometric mean (95% CI) p-value Geometric mean (95% CI) p-value
Unadjusted analysis        
Groups    <0.0012   0.0242   0.0212
Group 1 (ACS) 48 2.26 (2.07, 2.47) group 1 vs. 2: 0.0013 4.57 (4.02, 5.19) group 1 vs. 2: 0.0213 1.55 (1.44,1.68) group 1 vs. 2: 0.0383
Group 2 (DM) 59 1.83 (1.69, 1.98) group 1 vs. 3: 0.0053 3.61 (3.22, 4.05) group 1 vs. 3: 0.093 1.36 (1.27, 1.46) group 1 vs. 3: 0.0323
Group 3 (C) 88 1.90 (1.78, 2.03) group 2 vs. 3: 0.733 3.86 (3.51, 4.24) group 2 vs. 3: 0.663 1.37 (1.30, 1.45) group 2 vs. 3: 0.99
Adjusted analysis 1        
Groups    0.0102   0.0612   0.102
Group 1 (ACS) 48 2.33 (2.14, 2.55) group 1 vs. 2: 0.0073 4.57 (4.00, 5.22) group 1 vs. 2: 0.0503 1.58 (1.45,1.71) group 1 vs. 2: 0.103
Group 2 (DM) 59 1.95 (1.78, 2.13) group 1 vs. 3: 0.093 3.71 (3.24, 4.24) group 1 vs. 3: 0.473 1.41 (1.30, 1.53) group 1 vs. 3: 0.223
Group 3 (C) 88 2.05 (1.87, 2.25) group 2 vs. 3: 0.563 4.11 (3.59, 4.71) group 2 vs. 3: 0.383 1.44 (1.32, 1.56) group 2 vs. 3: 0.433
  1. 1. Adjusted by smoking and hypertension status
  2. 2. p-value based on F-test
  3. 3. p-value based on Tukey-Kramer test