Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean monocyte FcR expression in 195 study patients

From: Association between monocyte Fcγ subclass expression and acute coronary syndrome

  

FcR I

FcR II

FcR III

 

N

Geometric mean (95% CI)

p-value

Geometric mean (95% CI)

p-value

Geometric mean (95% CI)

p-value

Unadjusted analysis

       

Groups

  

<0.0012

 

0.0242

 

0.0212

Group 1 (ACS)

48

2.26 (2.07, 2.47)

group 1 vs. 2: 0.0013

4.57 (4.02, 5.19)

group 1 vs. 2: 0.0213

1.55 (1.44,1.68)

group 1 vs. 2: 0.0383

Group 2 (DM)

59

1.83 (1.69, 1.98)

group 1 vs. 3: 0.0053

3.61 (3.22, 4.05)

group 1 vs. 3: 0.093

1.36 (1.27, 1.46)

group 1 vs. 3: 0.0323

Group 3 (C)

88

1.90 (1.78, 2.03)

group 2 vs. 3: 0.733

3.86 (3.51, 4.24)

group 2 vs. 3: 0.663

1.37 (1.30, 1.45)

group 2 vs. 3: 0.99

Adjusted analysis 1

       

Groups

  

0.0102

 

0.0612

 

0.102

Group 1 (ACS)

48

2.33 (2.14, 2.55)

group 1 vs. 2: 0.0073

4.57 (4.00, 5.22)

group 1 vs. 2: 0.0503

1.58 (1.45,1.71)

group 1 vs. 2: 0.103

Group 2 (DM)

59

1.95 (1.78, 2.13)

group 1 vs. 3: 0.093

3.71 (3.24, 4.24)

group 1 vs. 3: 0.473

1.41 (1.30, 1.53)

group 1 vs. 3: 0.223

Group 3 (C)

88

2.05 (1.87, 2.25)

group 2 vs. 3: 0.563

4.11 (3.59, 4.71)

group 2 vs. 3: 0.383

1.44 (1.32, 1.56)

group 2 vs. 3: 0.433

  1. 1. Adjusted by smoking and hypertension status
  2. 2. p-value based on F-test
  3. 3. p-value based on Tukey-Kramer test