Skip to main content

Table 2 Genotype distribution in the German and Lithuanian cohort

From: Less functional variants of TLR-1/-6/-10 genes are associated with age

German cohort

Young subjects (Age < 50, n = 866)

Old subjects (Age ≥ 50, n = 523)

P-value

 

Wt (%)

Het (%)

Hom (%)

Wt (%)

Het (%)

Hom (%)

 

TLR-6 (P249S)a

336 (38.8)

399 (46.1)

130 (24.9)

158 (30.2)

256 (48.9)

109 (20.8)

0.001

TLR-1

70

300

495

15

184

324

<0.001

prom.

(8.1)

(34.6)

(57.2)

(2.9)

(35.2)

(62.0)

 

TLR-1

68

303

494

15

173

335

<0.001

(N248S)

(7.9)

(35.0)

(57.0)

(2.9)

(33.1)

(64.1)

 

TLR-1

91

329

445

21

186

316

<0.001

(I602S)

(10.5)

(38.0)

(52.4)

(4.0)

(35.6)

(60.4)

 

TLR-10

603

231

31

371

142

10

0.205

(V775L)

(69.6)

(26.7)

(3.6)

(70.9)

(27.2)

(1.9)

 

Lithuanian cohort

Young subjects (Age < 50)

Old subjects (Age ≥ 50)

P-value

 

Wt (%)

Het (%)

Hom (%)

Wt (%)

Het (%)

Hom (%)

 

TLR-6 (P249S)

319

336

106

97

114

38

0.689

(n = 761, n = 250)

(41.9)

(44.2)

(13.9)

(38.8)

(45.6)

(15.2)

 

TLR-1 prom.

25

222

515

4

52

194

0.009

(n = 762, n = 250)

(3.3)

(29.1)

(67.6)

(1.6)

(20.8)

(77.6)

 

TLR-1 (N248S)

24

220

525

3

52

198

0.008

(n = 769, n = 251)

(3.1)

(28.6)

(68.3)

(1.2)

(20.7)

(78.9)

 

TLR-1 (I602S)

29

242

498

7

58

189

0.018

(n = 762, n = 250

(3.8)

(31.8)

(65.4)

(2.8)

(23.2)

(75.6)

 

TLR-10 (V775L)

575

166

7

209

38

1

0.044

(n = 748, n = 248)

(76.9)

(22.2)

(0.9)

(84.3)

(15.3)

(0.4)

 
  1. P-values were determined by 3×2 Chi2 comparing young and old subjects. Significant P-values below 0.05 were printed in bold. Different sample numbers in the Lithuanian cohort are due to the fact that some samples failed to be genotyped for all SNPs.aTLR-6 genotypes for this cohort have mostly been published previously [17]