Skip to main content

Table 3 Subtype abundancies of memory T-cells

From: Immunosenescence in persons with spinal cord injury in relation to urinary tract infections -a cross-sectional study-

  

yCtr (SD)

ySCI (SD)

oCtr (SD)

oSCI (SD)

yCtr-oCtr (p-value)

ySCI-oSCI (p-value)

yCtr-ySCI (p-value)

oCtr-oSCI (p-value)

 

N

41

42

42

41

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

CD4

Tn % of CD4

47 (16)

39 (14)

49 (15)

39 (16)

0.66 ↔

0.81 ↔

<0.05

<0.01

 

Tscm % of CD4

8.5 (3)

8.5 (3)

9.0 (4)

8.7 (3)

0.71 ↔

0.73 ↔

0.74

0.76

 

Tcm + tm % of CD4

42 (14)

50 (13)

39 (14)

48 (17)

0.27 ↔

0.53 ↔

<0.01

<0.01

 

Tem % of CD4

2.0 (3)

1.4 (2)

1.9 (3)

2.3 (3)

0.94 ↔

<0.05 ↑

0.57

0.23

 

Tte % of CD4

1.0 (1)

0.6 (1)

1.3 (4)

1.3 (2)

0.16 ↔

<0.01 ↑

<0.01

0.32

CD8

Tn % of CD8

32 (18)

34 (17)

19 (12)

14 (13)

<0.001 ↓

<0.001 ↓

0.48

<0.05

 

Tscm % of CD8

13 (7)

14 (8)

15 (10)

12 (6)

0.57 ↔

0.52 ↔

0.80

0.44

 

Tcm + tm % of CD8

28 (10)

32 (13)

32 (14)

39 (18)

0.21 ↔

0.08

0.21

0.12

 

Tem % of CD8

8.4 (6)

5.8 (4)

8.1 (6)

9.8 (10)

0.73 ↔

<0.05 ↑

<0.05

0.58

 

Tte % of CD8

19 (14)

14 (10)

26 (18)

25 (19)

0.11 ↔

<0.05 ↑

0.19

0.83

  1. Mean values are shown as percentage of total CD4 or CD8 T-cells
  2. SD standard deviation is shown in brackets, N/A not applicable, Tn naïve-, Tscm central-, Tcm + tm central and transitional-, Tem effector-, Tte terminally differentiated memory T-cell, ↑ ↓↔ increasing, decreasing or no trend (p > 0.1) with age