Different peripheral expression patterns of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease
Immunity & Ageing volume 20, Article number: 3 (2023)
The diffuse distribution of nicotinic cholinergic receptors (nAChRs) in both brain and peripheral immune cells points out their involvement in several pathological conditions. Indeed, the deregulated function of the nAChR was previously correlated with cognitive decline and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).
The evaluation in peripheral immune cells of nAChR subtypes, which could reflect their expression in brain regions, is a prominent investigation area.
This study aims to evaluate the expression levels of both the nAChR subunits and the main known inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with DLB and AD to better characterize their involvement in these two diseases.
Higher gene expression levels of TNFα, IL6 and IL1β were observed in DLB and AD patients in comparison with healthy controls (HC). In our cohort, a reduction of nAChRα4, nAChRβ2 and nAChRβ4 was detected in both DLB and AD with respect to HC. Considering nAChR gene expressions in DLB and AD, significant differences were observed for nAChRα3, nAChRα4, nAChRβ2 and nAChRβ4 between the two groups. Moreover, the acetylcholine esterase (AChE) gene expression was significantly higher in DLB than in AD. Correlation analysis points out the relation between different nAChR subtype expressions in DLB (nAChRβ2 vs nAChRα3; nAChRα4 vs nAChRα3) and AD (nAChRα4 vs nAChRα3; nAChRα4 vs nAChRβ4; nAChRα7 vs nAChRα3; nAChRα7 vs nAChRα4).
Different gene expressions of both pro-inflammatory cytokines and nAChR subtypes may represent a peripheral link between inflammation and neurodegeneration. Inflammatory cytokines and different nAChRs should be valid and accurate peripheral markers for the clinical diagnosis of DLB and AD. However, although nAChRs show a great biological role in the regulation of inflammation, no significant correlation was detected between nAChR subtypes and the examined cytokines in our cohort of patients.
The Central Nervous System (CNS) has been considered for many years as an immune-privileged area protected by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), but this concept has been dismissed by the identification of extensive interaction between the peripheral and brain immune systems . Indeed, the cytokines produced by the peripheral immune cells can cross the BBB determining microglia and astrocyte activation , whereas cytokines produced by CNS cells, including astrocytes and neurons, can cause neuroinflammation after the stimulation of peripheral cytokines [3, 4].
Neuroinflammation represents an initial beneficial mechanism that defends the CNS from different pathogenic agents. However, it can subsequently contribute to a neurodegenerative process for its continuous inflammatory response to endogenous and exogenous factors .
Inflammation, as well as neurodegeneration, may be related to cholinergic dysfunction, which is also implicated in neuron-glia interactions. The cholinergic system plays its function by the neurotransmission of acetylcholine (ACh), which is facilitated by the binding of both muscarinic and nicotinic receptors (nAChR) .
The involvement of the cholinergic system in these two processes, such as inflammation and neurodegeneration, is mainly related to the presence of the nAChRα7. Indeed, the binding of ACh, released from the basal forebrain nuclei to nAChRα7, seems to determine a cytokine reduction by the activation of microglia and astrocytes. Therefore, the decrease of such CNS inflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)1, IL6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), tends to increase neurogenesis and cell survival, preventing neuronal loss and minimizing neuroinflammation.
Nowadays, it is well-known that all components of the cholinergic system (i.e., ACh, nAChRs, muscarinic receptors, acetylcholinesterase - AChE) are present in most peripheral immune cells, including lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, which contribute to the regulation of several immunological functions via the nAChRs [7,8,9,10,11]. Like microglia, also peripheral macrophages express nAChRα7, which, when activated, suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine release .
Structurally, nAChRs are well-characterized membrane proteins, composed of five transmembrane subunits. Seventeen distinctive subunits were identified (α2–α10, β1–β4, γ, δ, and ε), which can be differently assembled to form either heteromeric (e.g., nAChRα4/β2) or homomeric pentamers (e.g., nAChRα7) .
As well as nAChRα7, nAChRα4/β2, which is a high-affinity binding protein, is also expressed in brain and peripheral immune cells and it is considered to have a major role in cognitive functions . However, whether nAChRα4/β2 is involved in anti-inflammatory pathways remains poorly understood. Several studies reported that the activation of nAChRα4/β2 by the agonist nicotine suppressed IL1β and IL6, supporting the role of those receptors in neuroinflammation [15,16,17].
The increasing evidence that peripheral inflammation and neuroinflammation in the CNS are closely related suggests that altered peripheral inflammatory markers may unveil an underpinning neurodegenerative process . Considering their accessibility and practicality, inflammatory markers in peripheral blood should be considered to monitor the presence of neuroinflammation in patients suffering from a neurodegenerative condition.
In the two most common neurodegenerative dementia i.e. Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), cortical cholinergic neurotransmission is progressively impaired, leading to the onset of cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms [19,20,21,22]. Therefore, the identification in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of different receptors (nAChR subtypes and all five muscarinic receptors) [23,24,25] may be correlated with their expression in brain regions . Derangement of muscarinic leukocyte receptors has been previously observed in AD and DLB patients . The present study aimes to characterize the expression level of nAChR subunits and of inflammatory cytokines in PBMCs of patients suffering from DLB and AD in comparison with healthy control (HC) subjects.
Patient recruitment and eligibility
Twenty-one patients diagnosed with probable DLB according to clinical criteria  (taking into account the one-year rule to rule out a diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease with dementia) and thirteen patients with AD , frequency matched for gender, age, education, disease duration, and cognitive level, naïve to AChE inhibitors (AChEIs) treatment, were consecutively recruited from the Dementia Center of the Neurology Unit, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara. Eight HC, frequency matched for age and gender, were recruited among the patients’ spouses. Clinical assessment, including anthropometric measurements and physical examination, was performed at the baseline visit. In all patients enrolled, cognitive and neuropsychiatric profiles were also evaluated. The presence of fluctuating cognition (CF) was assessed by the CAF questionnaire , the presence of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) by the Mayo Questionnaire , parkinsonism was assessed by the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score (part III) , and the presence of visual hallucinations (VH) by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) . Cognitive impairment was evaluated by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test . For each participant with cognitive decline, the Clinical dementia rating (CDR) scale was also calculated .
This study has been conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and subsequent revisions and approved by the Ethics Committee at the University “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara (Protocol code 2098 11/6/2020. Protocol “Neurodem” 26/7/2018, amend. 2/8/2018). All the participants or their caregivers signed informed consent to participate to the study.
A blood sample was taken from each participant for biochemical and hematological measurements. Peripheral venous blood samples (10 mL) were collected in vacutainer tubes containing EDTA, according to the routine puncture method. Blood was layered over 5 mL of Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare, Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) and centrifuged at 1600 rpm for 40 min at room temperature. PBMCs were harvested from the interface, washed with Phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) and the cell pellet was resuspended in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) and stored at − 80 °C for later analysis of gene expression.
RNA extraction, RT and real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from PBMCs using QIAzol reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA concentration was determined by measuring the samples’ absorbance at 260 nm by NanoDrop 2000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and its purity was assessed by the absorbance ratio 260/280 nm and 260/230 nm. For each sample, 1 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Subsequently, Real-Time PCR was performed using the GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix (Promega, Milan, Italy), to evaluate the gene expression (Table 1). All qRT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicates using the Mastercycler ep (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) with the following conditions: initially, 2 min incubation at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles consisting in 30s 95°C, then 60 °C for 1 min and 30s at 68 °C. The gene expression analysis was done according to the ΔΔCt method .
Descriptive analysis was carried out using median and interquartile range (IQR) for the quantitative variables and percentages values for the qualitative ones. Despite transformation of quantitative data (logarithmic and boxcox), the Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that data were not normally distributed (p ≤ 0.05). For this reason, it was decided to leave the data in their original scale and to use non-parametric techniques.
The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to evaluate the differences between continuous variables and groups (DLB, AD and HC); Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test to evaluate the association between categorical variables and groups. The Dunn test, with Bonferroni’s correction, was calculated for the comparison between the pairs of medians for the identification of significant differences.
Non-parametric two sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test was used to compare cytokine gene expression between AD and DLB. Sign test was applied to evaluate the differences between AD and DLB levels vs HC.
Correlations among variables were tested using Spearman’s rho coefficients. For these analyses considering the explanatory nature of the study and the null hypothesis tested, we did not perform multiplicity adjustment.
Statistical significance was set at the level of ≤0.05, unless Bonferroni’s adjustment for multiple comparisons was needed (in this case the significance threshold was 0.0167 (p/k, assuming k = 3 contrast)). The power analyses assuming a large effect size showed adequate power (G∗Power 22.214.171.124). The analyses were performed using Stata software v17.1 (StataCorp, College Station, USA).
Demographic and clinical characteristics
Table 2 reports full details of subject demographic and clinical characteristics. No significant differences were found for age, gender, and disease duration among groups. As expected, MoCA median scores were lower in DLB and AD patients compared to HC (p < 0.001).
Clinical parameters for DLB patients showed that UPDRS-III median value was 23 (IQR 14–37); 19 patients presented parkinsonism (90.48%); 13 showed CF (61.9%); 16 presented VH (76.19%); 18 had RBD (85.71%).
Inflammatory cytokine expression
Overall, DLB and AD patients had higher IL1β gene expression than HC group. In detail, in DLB vs HC median was equal to 66.0 (IQR 52.9–79.1) and AD vs HC median was 26.4 (IQR 10.7–61.0). Moreover, IL1β gene levels were significantly higher in DLB than in AD (p = 0.008) (Fig. 1a). A higher gene expression of TNFα was also observed in DLB and AD patients compared to HC (DLB vs HC median = 3.7 (IQR 2.4–6.4); AD vs HC median = 25.9 (IQR 13.8–45.3). The expression of TNFα was significantly lower in DLB than in AD (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1b).
Both DLB and AD groups showed higher IL6 gene expression with respect to control group (DLB vs HC median = 2.6 (IQR 1.5–5.8); AD vs HC median = 3.1 (IQR 1.2–4.6)). However, any significant difference was not detected between the two groups (p = 0.785) (Fig. 1c).
nAChR subunits gene expression
No significant differences were detected between HC and either DLB or AD in nAChRα7 gene expression (DLB vs HC (median = 0.6 (IQR 0.2–0.8); AD vs HC (median = 0.3 (IQR 0.2–0.6); AD vs DLB (p = 0.454)) (Fig. 2a). In DLB patients, the gene expression level of nAChRα3 was lower than in HC (median = 0.7 (IQR 0.3–0.9)) and in AD (median = 4.6 (IQR 2.3–6.3)) (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2b). Considering nAChRα4 gene expression, a decrease was observed in both DLB and AD patients compared to HC (DLB vs HC: median 0.3 (IQR 0.2–0.8); AD vs HC: median = 0.0 (IQR 0.0–0.0)), although a significantly lower expression was detected in AD compared to DLB (p = 0.001) (Fig. 2c).
The nAChRβ4 gene expression was downregulated in both DLB and AD patients (DLB vs HC: median = 0.4 (IQR 0.2–0.5); AD vs HC: median = 0.0 (IQR 0.0–0.0)), and it was significantly lower in AD in comparison with DLB (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2d).
Respect to HC, nAChRβ2 gene expression was reduced in both DLB and AD patients (DLB vs HC: median = 0.0 (IQR 0.0–0.1); AD vs HC: median = 0.7 (IQR 0.5–0.8)), and significantly lower expression levels were observed in DLB compared to AD (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2e).
AChE gene expression
A different gene expression of AChE was detected in DLB vs AD patients (DLB median = 2.0 (IQR 1.7–3.1) vs AD median = 0.4 (IQR 0.1–0.9), p = 0.002) (Fig. 3).
Among several nAChR subtypes, a significant correlation was observed in both DLB and AD groups (Fig. 4). Indeed, in DLB group, a positive moderate correlation was detected between nAChRβ2 and nAChRα3 (rho = 0.589, p = 0.020), and between nAChRα4 and nAChRα3 (rho = 0.500, p = 0.041). In AD subjects, a positive correlation was also shown between nAChRα4 and nAChRα3 (rho = 0.762, p = 0.028) and between nAChRα4 and nAChRβ4 (rho = 0.717, p = 0.029), whereas a negative moderate correlation was observed between nAChRα7 and nAChRα3 (rho = − 0.683, p = 0.042) and between nAChRα7 and nAChRα4 (rho = − 0.683, p = 0.042).
Our results confirmed different peripheral inflammatory responses, as well as cholinergic involvement, in DLB and AD patients in comparison with HC subjects.
Pro-inflammatory cytokines were remarkably overexpressed in the two neurodegenerative dementias as compared to controls. Specifically, IL6, TNFα and IL1β gene expression was up regulated in both DLB and AD patients vs. HC. TNFα was however down-regulated in DLB vs.AD and IL1β was up-regulated in DLB compared to AD. These findings support the hypothesis that immune system might play a pivotal role in neurodegenerative pathways. Indeed, previous data reported peripheral inflammatory dysfunction in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia [37, 38].
An increased microglia activation and, therefore, a pronounced production of cytokines have been observed in the brains of patients affected by DLB and AD [39, 40]. Some evidence suggested as pro-inflammatory cytokines secreted by microglial cells, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα, may promote the overproduction of pathogenic β-amyloid proteins in AD brains . An increased level of these pro-inflammatory cytokines was also observed in different DLB brain regions, suggesting a possible role in the spreading of alpha-synuclein aggregation in the CNS .
Pro-inflammatory cytokines seem to induce various intracellular signal transduction and metabolic pathways that, in combination with the expression of different nAChR subtypes, could produce distinctive immunological responses in DLB and AD individuals .
Indeed, differences in the glial response in AD vs. DLB have been suggested based on different cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glial markers profiles .
In our study we did not find significant differences in the peripheral immunological patterns of cytokines between DLB and AD. This might be due to our small sample size or to the fact that our patients were at an overt stage of dementia, when differences in the pathophysiological mechanisms might be blurred by the higher levels of co-pathology.
However, an equally increased peripheral inflammation was recently reported in DLB and AD patients at the stage of mild cognitive impairment .
In the pathophysiology of cognitive decline, cholinergic impairment plays a central role in both AD and DLB conditions as a regulator of both neurodegenerative pathway and inflammatory response. Therefore, it is necessary clarify the interaction between cytokines and nAChRs [42, 43]. We measured the expression levels of nAChR subtypes, demonstrating different mRNA expressions among AD, DLB, and HC subjects. For all the nAChRs analyzed (i.e., nAChRα4, nAChRβ2 and nAChRβ4), the expression levels were lower in AD and DLB than HC subjects, whereas the gene expression of nAChRα3 was higher in AD and lower in DLB, respect to HC. No differences were found for nAChRα7 among groups.
The peripheral downregulation of nAChRs, observed in our cohort, may be related to the central cholinergic deficiency, which typically contribute to the pathogenesis of two diseases in study  but such an association needs to be deeply investigated as highlighted in the limitations of the study section.
Relatively greater losses of AChRs in DLB compared to AD have been reported in temporal and parietal neocortex and thalamic nuclei .
These characteristics are at the basis of the reported good symptomatic effect of AChEIs in DLB .
Additionally, our findings supported the hypothesis of an anti-inflammatory role for the cholinergic system; indeed, it was previously described as the binding of ACh to nAChRs may modulate the activity of immune cells, inhibiting cytokine synthesis and release [46, 47]. Our results support the effective interaction between cholinergic system and systemic inflammatory response since a peripheral derangement of nAChR expression correlated to increased levels of peripheral pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Therefore, in AD and DLB patients, the decrease of peripheral nAChR levels, as well as the activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines, might be considered as additional diagnostic biomarkers. The finding needs to be further investigated and validated in terms of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in larger cohorts.
Notably, our results did not reveal a significant association among peripheral cytokines, nAChRs and clinical features (i.e., MoCA, CDR or disease duration), suggesting as this systemic proinflammatory activity may be considered as a marker of disease more than marker of disease stage or progression.
Limitations of the study
Although the study reached its aim, there were some limitations.
The main constraint is related to the small cohort sample, which does not allow for generalizable considerations and to assess diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the studied peripheral inflammatory markers. In addition, our results suggested a possible correlation between peripheral and central inflammation: but, further investigations should be focused on the assessment of the central immune system markers, measuring CSF cells, or performing imaging studies with microglia specific radiotracers, to better enforce the hypothesis of a direct correlation between neurodegeneration and both peripheral and central inflammation.
In summary, the present study demonstrates an altered gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and nAChR subunits from PBMCs of patients suffering from DLB and AD. These changes may reflect the CNS inflammatory activity involved in the neurodegenerative process. The measurement of these peripheral markers might be an attractive option to monitor cholinergic system dysfunction which may support clinical diagnoses and open the way for innovative treatment strategy.
Further investigations are necessary to understand if pro-inflammatory cytokines in DLB and AD individuals may differently modify receptor activity through a post-translational process that influence the distribution through the central and peripheral cholinergic system of nAChRs and their relative functions.
Availability of data and materials
The data supporting the results of this article are included within the article and can be required to the corresponding authors.
Central Nervous System
Dementia with Lewy bodies
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Nicotinic cholinergic receptors
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Peripheral nervous system
REM sleep behavior disorder
Tumor necrosis factor
Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale
Skaper SD, Facci L, Zusso M, Giusti P. An inflammation-centric view of neurological disease: beyond the neuron. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:72.
Filipov NM. Overview of peripheral and central inflammatory responses and their contribution to neurotoxicity. In: Aschner M, Costa LG, editors. Advances in neurotoxicology; 2019.
Prinz M, Priller J. The role of peripheral immune cells in the CNS in steady state and disease. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:136–44.
Dantzer R. Neuroimmune interactions: from the brain to the immune system and vice versa. Physiol Rev. 2018;98:477–504.
Kwon HS, Koh SH. Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: the roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl Neurodegener. 2020;9(1):42.
Halder N, Lal G. Cholinergic system and its therapeutic importance in inflammation and autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2021;12:660342.
Fujii T, Mashimo M, Moriwaki Y, Misawa H, Ono S, Horiguchi K, et al. Physiological functions of the cholinergic system in immune cells. J Pharmacol Sci. 2017;134:1–21.
Fujii T, Mashimo M, Moriwaki Y, Misawa H, Ono S, Horiguchi K, et al. Expression and function of the cholinergic system in immune cells. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1085.
Kawashima K, Fujii T. Extraneuronal cholinergic system in lymphocytes. Pharmacol Ther. 2000;86:29–48.
Kawashima K, Fujii T. The lymphocytic cholinergic system and its contribution to the regulation of immune activity. Life Sci. 2003;74:675–96.
Gallowitsch-Puerta M, Pavlov VA. Neuro-immune interactions via the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Life Sci. 2007;80:2325–9.
De Simone R, Ajmone-Cat MA, Carnevale D, Minghetti L. Activation of alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor by nicotine selectively up-regulates cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E2 in rat microglial cultures. J Neuroinflammation. 2005;2:4.
Dani JA. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor structure and function and response to nicotine. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2015;124:3–19.
Benhammou K, Lee M, Strook M, Sullivan B, Logel J, Raschen K, et al. [(3) H] Nicotine binding in peripheral blood cells of smokers is correlated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:2818–29.
Hosur V, Leppanen S, Abutaha A, Loring RH. Gene regulation of alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptors: microarray analysis of nicotine-induced receptor up-regulation and anti-inflammatory effects. J Neurochem. 2009;111(3):848–58.
Matsunaga K, Klein TW, Friedman H, Yamamoto Y. Involvement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in suppression of antimicrobial activity and cytokine responses of alveolar macrophages to legionella pneumophila infection by nicotine. J Immunol. 2001;167:6518–24.
Martín A, Szczupak B, Gómez-Vallejo V, Domercq M, Cano A, Padro D, et al. In vivo PET imaging of the α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor as a marker for brain inflammation after cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci. 2015;35(15):5998–6009.
Holmes C. Review: systemic inflammation and alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2013;39:51–68.
Perry EK, Tomlinson BE, Blessed G, Bergmann K, Gibson PH, Perry RH. Correlation of cholinergic abnormalities with senile plaques and mental test scores in senile dementia. Br Med J. 1987;2:1457–9.
Perry EK, Marshall E, Perry RH, Irving D, Smith CJ, Blessed G, et al. Cholinergic and dopaminergic activities in senile dementia of Lewy body type. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1990;4:87–95.
Ballard C, Piggott M, Johnson M, Cairns N, Perry R, McKeith I, et al. Delusions associated with elevated muscarinic binding in dementia with Lewy bodies. Ann Neurol. 2000;48:868–76.
Mesulam MM, Geula C. Nucleus basalis (Ch4) and cortical cholinergic innervation in the human brain: observations based on the distribution of acetylcholinesterase and choline acetyltransferase. J Comp Neurol. 1988;275:216–40.
Tayebati SK, Piergentili A, Natale D, Amenta F. Evaluation of an agonist index: affinity ratio for compounds active on muscarinic cholinergic M2 receptors. J Auton Pharmacol. 1999;19:77–84.
Reale M, Iarlori C, Gambi F, Feliciani C, Salone A, Toma L, et al. Treatment with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor in Alzheimer patients modulates the expression and production of the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;148(1–2):162–71.
Costa P, Auger CB, Traver DJ, Costa LG. Identification of m3, m4 and m5 subtypes of muscarinic receptor mRNA in human blood mononuclear cells. J Neuroimmunol. 1995;60:45–51.
Fujii T, Kawashima K. YM905, a novel M3 antagonist, inhibits Ca2+ signaling and c-fos gene expression mediated via muscarinic receptors in human T cells. Gen Pharmacol. 2000;35:71–5.
Reale M, Carrarini C, Russo M, Dono F, Ferri L, Di Pietro M, et al. Muscarinic receptors expression in the peripheral blood cells differentiate dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;85(1):323–30.
McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology. 2017;89:88–100.
McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:263–9.
Walker MP, Ayre GA, Cummings JL, et al. Quantifying fluctuation in dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia. Neurology. 2000;54:1616–25 United States.
Boeve BF, Molano JR, Ferman TJ, et al. Validation of the Mayo sleep questionnaire to screen for REM sleep behavior disorder in a community-based sample. J Clin Sleep Med. 2013;9:475–80.
Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, et al. Movement disorder society-sponsored revision of the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. 2008;23:2129–70.
Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The neuropsychiatric inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994;44:2308–14.
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.
Morris JC. The clinical dementia rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43(11):2412–4.
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.
Usenko TS, Nikolaev MA, Miliukhina IV, et al. Plasma cytokine profile in synucleinophaties with dementia. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;78:323–6.
King E, O'Brien JT, Donaghy P, et al. Peripheral inflammation in prodromal Alzheimer's and Lewy body dementias. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(4):339–45.
Imamura K, Hishikawa N, Ono K, et al. Cytokine production of activated microglia and decrease in neurotrophic factors of neurons in the hippocampus of Lewy body disease brains. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;109(2):141–50.
Leng F, Edison P. Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here? Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(3):157–72.
Morena M, Creput C, Bouzernidj M, et al. Randomised trial on clinical performances and biocompatibility of four high-flux hemodialyzers in two mode treatments: hemodialysis vs post dilution hemodiafiltration. Sci Rep. 2019;9:18265.
Rei RT, Sabbagh MN, Corey-Bloom J, et al. Nicotinic receptor losses in dementia with Lewy bodies: comparisons with Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21(5):741–6.
Roy R, Niccolini F, Pagano G, et al. Cholinergic imaging in dementia spectrum disorders. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1376–86.
Perry E. Cholinergic mechanisms and cognitive decline. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998;15:768–73.
Aarsland D, Litvan I, Salmon D, et al. Performance on the dementia rating scale in Parkinson’s disease with dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies: comparison with progressive supranuclear palsy and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:1215–20.
Reale M, Di Nicola M, Velluto L, et al. Selective acetyl-and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors reduce amyloid-β ex vivo activation of peripheral chemo-cytokines from Alzheimer's disease subjects: exploring the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2014;11(6):608–22.
Reale M, Costantini E. Cholinergic modulation of the immune system in Neuroinflammatory diseases. Diseases. 2021;9(2):29.
This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research. University “G. d’Annunzio”, grant number FAR 2020.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study conformed to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of G.d’Annunzio University, Chieti-Pescara (Protocol code 2098. 11/6/2020. Protocol “Neurodem” 26/7/2018, amend. 2/8/2018). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Costantini, E., Carrarini, C., Borrelli, P. et al. Different peripheral expression patterns of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Immun Ageing 20, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-023-00329-9
- Dementia with Lewy bodies
- Alzheimer’s disease
- Cholinergic impairment
- Nicotinic receptors
- Acetylcholine esterase