Open Access

A G613A missense in the Hutchinson’s progeria lamin A/C gene causes a lone, autosomal dominant atrioventricular block

  • Francesco Villa1,
  • Anna Maciąg2,
  • Chiara C Spinelli1,
  • Anna Ferrario1,
  • Albino Carrizzo3,
  • Attilio Parisi4,
  • Annalaura Torella5,
  • Chiara Montenero6,
  • Gianluigi Condorelli7, 8,
  • Carmine Vecchione3, 9,
  • Vincenzo Nigro5,
  • Annibale S Montenero2 and
  • Annibale A Puca2, 9Email author
Immunity & Ageing201411:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-014-0019-3

Received: 28 October 2014

Accepted: 13 November 2014

Published: 26 November 2014

Abstract

Background

LMNA/C mutations have been linked to the premature aging syndrome Hutchinson’s progeria, dilated cardiomyopathy 1A, skeletal myopathies (such as the autosomal dominant variant of Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disorder type 2B1, mandibuloacral dysplasia, autosomal dominant partial lipodystrophy, and axonal neuropathy. Atrioventricular block (AVB) can be associated with several cardiac disorders and it can also be a highly heritable, primitive disease.

One of the most common pathologies associated with AVB is dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), which is characterized by cardiac dilatation and reduced systolic function. In this case, onset has been correlated with several mutations in genes essential for the proper maturation of cardiomyocytes, such as the gene for lamin A/C. However, no clear genotype–phenotype relationship has been reported to date between LMNA/C mutations and cardiomyopathies.

Results

DNA and medical histories were collected from (n = 11) members of different generations of one family, the proband of which was implanted with a pacemaker for lone, type II AVB. Exome sequencing analysis was performed on three relatives with AVB, and the mutations therein identified validated in a further three AVB-affected family members.

In the initial three AVB family members, we identified 10 shared nonsynonymous single-nucleotide variations with a rare or unreported allele frequency in the 1000 Genomes Project database. Follow-up genetic screening in the additional three affected relatives disclosed a correlation between the lone AVB phenotype and the single-nucleotide polymorphism rs56816490, which generates an E317K change in lamin A/C. Although this mutation has already been described by others in a DCM-affected proband with familiarity for AVB and sudden death, the absence of DCM in our large, AVB-affected family is indicative of genotype–phenotype correlation between rs56816490 and a familial, autosomal dominant form of lone AVB.

Conclusions

Screening for G613A in LMNA/C in patients with lone AVB and their relatives might prevent sudden death in families affected by AVB but without familiarity for DCM. Lone AVB is an age-related disease caused by mutations in LMN A/C gene rather than a complication of DCM.

Keywords

Arrhythmia Dilated cardiomyopathy Exome sequencing Atrioventricular block Lamin A/C

Background

Atrioventricular block (AVB) is a partial or complete block in the transmission of the electrical impulses originating in the atrium or sinus node and directed toward the AV node and ventricles. Depending on the gravity of AVB, cases are grouped into one of three different categories: type I AVB is characterized by prolongation of AV conduction time; type II AVB is characterized by failed transmission of some impulses, with consequent loss of some ventricular contractions; and type III AVB is characterized by complete AV dissociation and loss of many/all contractions or coordination with atrial contraction [1].

AVB can be associated with several cardiac disorders, such as dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), ischemia, infarction, and fibrosis, and may present as an aggravation of existing cardiac suffering. AVB can also be caused by a highly heritable, primitive disease presenting itself at an early age [2]. Little is known about the origin of progressive cardiac conduction defects, such as congenital AVB, although linkage analyses of affected families of different nationalities has led to the identification of several causal mutations in sodium-channel, melastatin-4, and NK2 homeobox 5 genes, [3]-[5] and to the identification of a disease-related locus at chr1q32.2-q32.3 [6].

One of the most common pathologies associated with AVB is DCM, which is characterized by cardiac dilatation and reduced systolic function. In this case, onset has been correlated with several mutations in genes essential for the proper maturation of cardiomyocytes. For example, autosomal dominant DCM and conduction system diseases are linked to a disease locus at chr1p1-q21, where the gene for lamin A/C (LMNA/C) is encoded [7]. The coding region of LMNA/C spans approximately 24 kb, harbors 12 exons, and produces the alternative splice products LMNA (74 kDa) and LMNC (65 kDa) [8]. Lamins have an essential role in maintaining nuclear shape and structure, transcriptional regulation, nuclear pore function, and heterochromatin organization [9]. In patients with DCM associated with AVB and carriers of LMNA/C mutations, reduced LMNA/C expression caused damage to cardiomyocyte nuclei and nuclear membranes, such as focal disruptions, bleb formations, and nuclear pore clustering [10].

Apart from dilated cardiomyopathy 1A, LMNA/C mutations have also been linked to the premature aging syndrome Hutchinson’s progeria, skeletal myopathies (such as the autosomal dominant variant of Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disorder type 2B1, mandibuloacral dysplasia, autosomal dominant partial lipodystrophy, and axonal neuropathy [9],[11]. However, no clear genotype–phenotype relationship has been reported to date between LMNA/C mutations and cardiomyopathies [12]. Therefore, we decided to identify causative mutation(s) through exome sequencing of a family with an autosomal dominant form of AVB.

Results and discussion

A large family from central Italy was recruited for the genetic study of a familial autosomal dominant form of lone, type II AVB. The pedigree was composed of 31 subjects belonging to five different generations, 10 of which presenting with the pathology. Six affected and five apparently unaffected members participated in the study (Figure 1). The criterion for AVB diagnosis was the presence of AV node block at either standard ECHO or 24-hour Holter recording, or the presence of an implanted pacemaker.
Figure 1

Pedigree of the studied atrioventricular block family. Generation is indicated with roman numerals, and individual ID is indicated with Arabic numerals. Solid squares (males) and circles (females) indicate affected subjects, open symbols indicate unaffected subjects, and gray symbols indicate unknown disease status. Diamonds indicate not-relevant subjects, and the numbers within them are the number of subjects. Diagonal lines indicate dead subjects. Arrows identify the analyzed subjects. M indicates the subjects carrying rs56816490. PM indicates pacemaker implantation. The proband is indicated with a red oval. Ages of subject are given beneath the individual’s ID number.

Electrophysiological study of the proband revealed a long AV-node refractory period of 420 msec at a cycle length of 600 msec, and 2:1 AV block at a cycle length of 450 msec. ECHO did not indicate the presence of DCM in the proband (see online Additional file 1), and there were no indications of DCM in the medical histories of any of the other affected family members, some of which had received a pacemaker (a summary of the subjects with known cardiovascular dysfunction is provided in Table 1). There was no significant information on predisposing life styles and risk factors for AVB in these subjects.
Table 1

Known medical histories of subjects in the pedigree

Generation

Subject ID

Age

Gender

Medical history

II

2

95

Female

Two pacemakers

II

5

98

Female

Pacemaker

II

7a

72

Male

Sudden death

II

7b

70

Male

Asthma

III

1

50

Female

Pacemaker

III

3

65

Female

Pacemaker

III

4

75

Male

Pacemaker

III

5

73

Female

Pacemaker

III

8

72

Male

Pacemaker

III

9

79

Female

Pacemaker

III

11a

66

Male

Sudden death

III

11b

75

Male

Sudden death

III

11c

71

Female

Small cardiac suffering

IV

4

59

Female

Pacemaker, atrial fibrillation

V

1

16

Male

Pacemaker

The exceptional longevity of some ancestors (95 years for II:1 and 98 years for II:5) and the reported [13] delay in the onset of age-associated diseases, including AVB, in long-living offspring induced us to run a study on only affected members, so as to avoid possible misclassification of affected status of the analyzed subjects [13].

To identify the causative gene mutation(s), we sequenced the whole exome of three affected members of the family: one fourth-generation member (IV:4, the proband) and two third-generation subjects (III:5 and III:8). Filtered results indicated that 10 nonsynonymous and damaging mutations were common to the three subjects (Table 2). We then checked the presence of these mutations in three other affected family members (III:1, III:3, and III:9): out of the 10 mutations assessed, G613A in LMN A/C (rs56816490) was carried in a heterozygous fashion by all affected individuals (Figure 2). Analysis for the presence of rs56816490 in non-affected family members and in 100 control subjects, in agreement with the 1000 Genomes Project, [14] was negative (Figure 3).
Table 2

Stop gain/nonsynonymous SNPs identified by exome sequencing

Variant coordinates

SNP ID

Gene

Function

Nucleotide changes

MAF* (%)

chr1:111784045

-

CHI3L2

Nonsynonymous

G-- > A

 

chr1:113162494

rs41283062

CAPZA1

Nonsynonymous

G-- > A

1.380

chr1:114367793

rs140698521

PTPN22

Nonsynonymous

C-- > T

0.064

chr1:156105704

rs56816490

LMNA

Nonsynonymous

G-- > A

 

chr4:2744193

-

TNIP2

Nonsynonymous

A-- > G

 

chr5:63802483

-

RGS7BP

Nonsynonymous

G-- > C

 

chr10:11374607

-

CELF2

-

T-- > A

 

chr11:104768141

rs138698464

CASP12

Nonsynonymous

G-- > A

1.335

chr21:34924550

rs142482063

SON

Nonsynonymous

G-- > T

0.044

chr22:19511925

rs885985

CLDN5

Stop gain

G-- > A

44.631

*,UCSC Genome Browser database. MAF = Minor allele frequency.

Figure 2

Electropherogram of the lamin A/C gene. Electropherograms of control (upper) and atrioventricular block-affected (lower) subjects showing heterozygosity for the LMNA/C mutation G613A in the latter. Heterozygosity is indicated by the presence of two peaks corresponding to G and A (arrow and magnification).

Figure 3

Frequency analysis of controls with PCR for rs56816490. Image of electrophoretic analysis of PCR validation amplifications of genomic DNA from pedigree subjects (III:2 and IV:4) and independent controls. Amplification of the mutated allele of LMNA/C (G613A) is present only in the affected subject (IV:4, the proband).

LMNA/C variations are responsible for many different diseases involving, above all, muscle tissue, including DCM with conduction defects [14]. However, to date there is no clear genotype–phenotype correlation between LMNA/C mutations and DCM associated with conduction disturbances. In the present study, we correlate the missense mutation G613A in LMNA/C (SNP ID rs56816490) with a familial, autosomal dominant form of AVB that we classify as “lone” based on the absence of DCM in the family’s medical history and on the absence of any abnormality in ventricular and atrial sizes in the proband. The SNP is located within the 6th exon of LMNA/C, which is located at chr1:156205704, and determines the amino acid change E317K in a segment of the LMNA/C coil 2 that does not interact with proteins or chromatin.

Arbustini et al. [15] have already described this mutation in a proband with AVB putatively associated with a late-onset DCM: the patient was suffering from AVB since age 44 years, had a family history of sudden death, and was implanted with pacemaker at age 69 years. The proband’s father, also a pacemaker carrier, received a post-mortem diagnosis of DCM, indicating that the son’s clinical status may worsen sometime in the future due to DCM, although this has not been documented to date [15]. Careful analysis of the mutations detected in DCM patients with conduction defects led Arbustini et al. [15] to conclude that clinical manifestations and disease evolution were more severe in patients with LMNA/C mutations that affected nuclear lamin interactions, whereas the E317K change, present in a non-interacting segment, was responsible for a mild phenotype.

In light of our data, we would re-consider the disease status of the LMNA/C E317K-carrying proband described by Arbustini et al. as affected with lone AVB. Of note, E317K is a rare change in LMNA/C, and both families were from Italy; thus, we cannot exclude a common origin of the mutation.

Conclusions

Our results are important for genetic counselling, pointing to the need for screening G613A in LMNA/C in patients with lone AVB and their relatives. Indeed, in the family we investigated, three subjects (one in generation II, and two in generation III) had a medical history of sudden death, as did the E317K LMNA/C carriers reported by Arbustini et al. [15]. Furthermore, our data point to lone AVB as a disease caused by mutation of LMNA/C inducing accelerated aging, and thus makes appealing the hypothesis that AVB is an age-related disease on its own right, other than a complication of DCM.

Methods

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origins in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects in accordance with the Review Board rules of IRCCS Multimedica. Subjects were evaluated, when possible, by medical history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Reports from echocardiography (ECHO), cardiac catheterization, electrophysiology studies, cardiac surgery, and/or autopsy were reviewed when available. Clinical assessment was performed without knowledge of genotype.

DNA isolation and exome sequencing

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood, using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midikit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Exonic regions of genomic DNA of three affected subjects (IDs III:5, III:8, and IV:4) were enriched using either the TruSeq™ Exome Enrichment Kit (Illumina) or the Agilent Haloplex Exome kit based on DNA digestion and capture. Exomes were barcoded and sequenced at multiple sites on the Illumina HiSeq1000 platform, and either 2 × 76-bp (TruSeq) or 2 × 100-bp (Haloplex) PE libraries, using TruSeq SBS Kit v3–HS (Illumina) reagents and a TruSeq PE Cluster kit v.3-cbot-HS flow cell. Average coverage for all the experiments was 70x and at least 20x for 89% of the target. Paired sequencing reads were aligned to the reference genome (UCSC, hg19 build) using BWA [16] and sorted with SAMtools [17] and Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). Post-alignment processing (local realignment around insertions-deletions and base recalibration), SNV, and small insertions-deletions (ins-del) calling were performed with Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) [18] with parameters adapted to the haloplex-generated sequences. The called SNV and ins-del variants produced with both platforms were annotated using ANNOVAR [19].

Data filtering

The results were first filtered to eliminate common variants (MAF > 1%), variants with low quality score, and variants not shared by all analyzed affected subjects, when covered. Additional frequency filters were used by comparing internal databases of whole exome sequencing data (n = 300). Prioritization was also made based on MAF frequency (complete data sets are available in online Additional file 2).

Validation analysis

Genomic DNA of the remaining affected subjects was amplified by standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The amplified fragments were purified with the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega) and were sequenced in order to identify the mutation associated with AVB. Primer sequences and PCR conditions are given in Table 3.
Table 3

Primer sequences used in the validation analysis

Gene

Forward Primer (5’-3’)

Reverse Primer (5’-3’)

Tm (°C)

CHI3L2

TAACCCATTACTGACCCTCTCGT

CTGCTGGATCCCATCCTAGA

61

CAPZA1

GTGATTCCATCACTCGGCTT

GTCAGCATGGACCAAGAAGC

64

PTPN22

GACCCTATGGAGGCTCTGTTTA

AAATCAAGTAGAGGTTTTGCACTG

61

LMNA

CGAGGAGCTGCAGCAGTC

CGCATCTCGGCCATCTC

65.5

TNIP2

GAACCTGAGACCTGGCTTTGTG

CTGAAGCACTGCAGGCAGTG

65

RGS7BP

CCAGGGCAACAACCGG

GCAGTTTTCACCCACCATCTT

61

CELF2

TACTGACCAAATACCTAGCACC

AGAGGCTAGTCCTTTCCATC

61

CASP12

GCATTGCTCACCACAAACT

CGGTGTTCTGGTCCACAT

58

SON

GACCCTACAGGATAGCACCCA

CGCTCGTAGGCTGACATCAT

61

CLDN5

CCATGGCTAGAGGCGAGAC

GCACGGATTGGCTGCTT

61

Mutation detection by PCR in controls

Two forward PCR primers were designed for the amplification of the rs56816490 locus in LMNA/C: a primer targeting wild-type LMNA/C (5′-CAGCTGGCAGCCAAGg-3′) and another primer targeting a mutated variant (5′-CAGCTGGCAGCCAAGa-3′). Direct amplification of genomic DNA of 100 controls was performed using independently both the forward primer and the reverse primer (5′-CGCATCTCGGCCATCTC-3′) followed by visualization on an agarose gel with ethidium bromide staining.

Additional files

Abbreviations

AVB: 

Atrioventricular block

DCM: 

Dilated cardiomyopathy

ECHO: 

Echocardiogram

LMNA/C: 

Lamin A/C

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

SNP: 

Single-nucleotide polymorphism

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients and medical doctors that participated in this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
ITB-CNR
(2)
IRCCS Multimedica
(3)
IRCCS Neuromed - Parco Tecnologico
(4)
Università degli Studi di Roma “Foro Italico”
(5)
Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli
(6)
Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata
(7)
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
(8)
Università degli Studi di Milano
(9)
Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II

References

  1. Johnson RL, Averill KH, Lamb LE: Electrocardiographic findings in 67,375 asymptomatic subjects. VII. Atrioventricular block. Am J Cardiol. 1960, 6: 153-177. 10.1016/0002-9149(60)90044-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruteau AE, Behaghel A, Fouchard S, Mabo P, Schott JJ, Dina C, Chatel S, Villain E, Thambo JB, Marcon F, Gournay V, Rouault F, Chantepie A, Guillaumont S, Godart F, Martins RP, Delasalle B, Bonnet C, Fraisse A, Schleich JM, Lusson JR, Dulac Y, Daubert JC, Le Marec H, Probst V: Parental electrocardiographic screening identifies a high degree of inheritance for congenital and childhood nonimmune isolated atrioventricular block. Circulation. 2012, 126: 1469-1477. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.069161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schott JJ, Benson DW, Basson CT, Pease W, Silberbach GM, Moak JP, Maron BJ, Seidman CE, Seidman JG: Congenital heart disease caused by mutations in the transcription factor NKX2-5. Science. 1998, 281: 108-111. 10.1126/science.281.5373.108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Watanabe H, Koopmann TT, Le Scouarnec S, Yang T, Ingram CR, Schott JJ, Demolombe S, Probst V, Anselme F, Escande D, Wiesfeld AC, Pfeufer A, Kääb S, Wichmann HE, Hasdemir C, Aizawa Y, Wilde AA, Roden DM, Bezzina CR: Sodium channel beta1 subunit mutations associated with Brugada syndrome and cardiac conduction disease in humans. J Clin Invest. 2008, 118: 2260-2268.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kruse M, Schulze-Bahr E, Corfield V, Beckmann A, Stallmeyer B, Kurtbay G, Ohmert I, Brink P, Pongs O: Impaired endocytosis of the ion channel TRPM4 is associated with human progressive familial heart block type I. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119: 2737-2744. 10.1172/JCI38292.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernandez P, Moolman-Smook J, Brink P, Corfield V: A gene locus for progressive familial heart block type II (PFHBII) maps to chromosome 1q32.2-q32.3. Hum Genet. 2005, 118: 133-137. 10.1007/s00439-005-0029-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fatkin D, MacRae C, Sasaki T, Wolff MR, Porcu M, Frenneaux M, Atherton J, Vidaillet HJ, Spudich S, De Girolami U, Seidman JG, Seidman C, Muntoni F, Müehle G, Johnson W, McDonough B: Missense mutations in the rod domain of the lamin A/C gene as causes of dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction-system disease. N Engl J Med. 1999, 341: 1715-1724. 10.1056/NEJM199912023412302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin F, Worman HJ: Structural organization of the human gene encoding nuclear lamin A and nuclear lamin C. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 16321-16326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Capell BC, Collins FS: Human laminopathies: nuclei gone genetically awry. Nat Rev Genet. 2006, 7: 940-952. 10.1038/nrg1906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Verga L, Concardi M, Pilotto A, Bellini O, Pasotti M, Repetto A, Tavazzi L, Arbustini E: Loss of lamin A/C expression revealed by immuno-electron microscopy in dilated cardiomyopathy with atrioventricular block caused by LMNA gene defects. Virchows Arch. 2003, 443: 664-671. 10.1007/s00428-003-0865-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rankin J, Ellard S: The laminopathies: a clinical review. Clin Genet. 2006, 70: 261-274. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00677.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sylvius N, Tesson F: Lamin A/C and cardiac diseases. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006, 21: 159-165. 10.1097/01.hco.0000221575.33501.58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Perls TT: The different paths to 100. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83: 484S-487S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, Handsaker RE, Kang HM, Marth GT, McVean GA: An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature. 2012, 491: 56-65. 10.1038/nature11632.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Arbustini E, Pilotto A, Repetto A, Grasso M, Negri A, Diegoli M, Campana C, Scelsi L, Baldini E, Gavazzi A, Tavazzi L: Autosomal dominant dilated cardiomyopathy with atrioventricular block: a lamin A/C defect-related disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002, 39: 981-990. 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01724-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Li H, Durbin R: Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 1754-1760. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R: The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 2078-2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, McKenna A, Fennell TJ, Kernytsky AM, Sivachenko AY, Cibulskis K, Gabriel SB, Altshuler D, Daly MJ: A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011, 43: 491-498. 10.1038/ng.806.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H: ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38: e164-10.1093/nar/gkq603. Available at www.1000genomes.org, and accessed in November 2013PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Villa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.