Open Access

Mycobacterium leprae Hsp65 administration reduces the lifespan of aged high antibody producer mice

  • Estevam José Baldon1,
  • Eliana Blini Marengo2,
  • Marcelo de Franco3,
  • Nancy Starobinas3,
  • Valquiria Bueno4Email author and
  • Osvaldo Augusto Sant’Anna1
Immunity & Ageing201411:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4933-11-6

Received: 26 November 2013

Accepted: 22 March 2014

Published: 26 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Aging process may result in immune modifications that lead to disruption of innate and acquired immunity mechanisms that may induce chronic-degenerative events. The heat shock proteins (Hsp), phylogeneticaly conserved among organisms, present as main function the ability of folding and refolding proteins, but they also are associated with chronic-degenerative disorders. Here were evaluated the role of M. leprae native Hsp65 (WT) and its point-mutated (K409A) on survival and anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 antibody production of aged genetically selected mice for high (HIII) and low (LIII) antibody production; data from 120- and 270-days old mice (named “adult” or “aged”, respectively) were compared.

Results

WT Hsp65 administration induces reduction in the mean survival time of adult and aged female HIII mice, this effect being stronger in aged individuals. Surprisingly, the native protein administration increased the survival of aged female LIII when compared to K409A and control groups. No survival differences were observed in aged male mice after Hsp65 proteins inoculation. We observed increase in IgG1 anti-Hsp65 in WT and K409A aged HIII female mice groups and no marked changes in the anti-DNA (adult and aged HIII) and anti-Hsp65 IgG1 or IgG2a isotypes production in adult HIII female and aged male mice. LIII male mice presented increased anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 IgG2a isotype production after WT or K409A injection, and LIII female groups showed no alterations.

Conclusions

The results revealed that the WT Hsp65 interferes with survival of aged HIII female mice without involvement of a remarkable IgG1 and IgG2a anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 antibodies production. The deleterious effects of Hsp65 on survival time in aged HIII female mice could be linked to a gender-effect and are in agreement with those previously reported in lupus-prone mice.

Keywords

Heat shock proteinHsp65AgingImmunosenescenceAntibody response

Background

Aging is defined as progressive alterations of biological functions, leading to the onset of diseases and reduced ability to respond to external stimuli [1]. Alongside with the physiological aging events, the immunosenescence accumulates potential modifications in immunological functions and its components. The most important changes include the decrease of the absolute number of lymphocytes, alterations of the activation status of T cells, increasing of serum levels of immunoglobulin (mainly IgA and IgG), limitation of the protective response of specific high affinity antibody, amplification of autoantibody production and a switch for a Th2 pattern of cytokine response [2]. The altered processes in advanced age also result in the failure of self and non-self discrimination [3] and disruption of the innate and acquired immunity mechanisms, which may result in chronic-degenerative events and subsequent loss of life quality [47]. Altogether, these modifications lead to an increased vulnerability to infections [8, 9], reduced response to vaccines [10], development of tumors [11, 12], and autoimmune or inflammatory diseases [13, 14]. In addition, disorders related to the abnormal processing, modification, and aggregation of proteins typically linked to biological properties of the heat shock proteins (Hsp) are reported [15, 16].

Drastic alterations in physiological responses to stressful events are related to Hsp production [1719]. Hsp are phylogeneticaly conserved molecules among evolutionary scale [20, 21] which assist misfolding molecules and control the arising of toxic protein aggregates, supporting the folding and unfolding of polypeptides for degradation by proteolytic machinery [22, 23]. Hsp65, the most abundant and immunogenic protein of mycobacteria [24], is considered a toxin and dominant antigen in infectious diseases, capable of induce humoral and cellular immune responses [2527]. Reports evidenced the immunodominant role of the Hsp60 family in infectious processes [28], besides of the role played in inflammatory processes such as arthritis, type I diabetes, multiple sclerosis and atherosclerosis [2932]. In the opposite, some studies demonstrate its regulatory function on immune suppression in rheumatoid arthritis [33] and type I diabetes [34].

Previously, our group evaluated the immunomodulatory effects in vivo of M. leprae Hsp65 on genetically homogeneous (NZBxNZW)F1 hybrid female mice that develop systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); the results showed that the native protein (WT) aggravates the lupus progression in mice [35]. On the other hand, the K409A, a point-mutated Hsp65 [36], revealed a potential in mitigating lupus aggravation in these mice [37]. Hsp65 administration also increased eye lesions in mice susceptible to the development of autoimmune uveitis [38].

Autoimmune diseases are more frequent in aged and in female individuals [39] and thus we asked whether Hsp65 interference in autoimmunity is age and/or gender-related. Reports of Hsp65 interference in autoimmunity and other biological alterations occurring during the immunosenescence process are related to gender and aging [40]. These findings lead us to investigate whether M. leprae Hsp65 is also involved in alterations of aged individuals, as the immunosenescence process can lead to the onset of autoimmunity. It was assessed the role played by passive administrations of WT and mutant K409A Hsp65 on the lifespan and antibody production of aged HIII and LIII mice. We conclude that the WT protein administration interferes with the survival of aged and adults HIII female mice, even though the anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 antibody production was not markedly changed. As no significant changes in male mice survival and antibodies production were observed we conclude that Hsp65 effects were gender-related.

Results

WT Hsp65 administration reduces the lifespan of HIII female mice

Male and female two hundred-seventy-days old (aged) mice were inoculated intraperitonially with a single dose of 2.5 μg/animal of WT or K409A Hsp65 in 0.2 mL of PBS, or only PBS as control group. Mice were observed until death for mean survival time (MST) and environmental variance (VE) determination (Table 1). Figure 1A illustrates the survival reduction of aged HIII female mice inoculated with the native protein (308 ± 25 days, p < 0.01) compared to controls (530 ± 123 days). Also it was observed a decrease of 24-fold in the WT group phenotypic variance (VE = 635 days in WT group versus VE = 15293 days in control group). Conversely, Figure 1B shows that aged LIII females inoculated with WT Hsp65 presented higher MST (615 ± 46 days; p < 0.01) compared to K409A (442 ± 97 days) and control group (441 ± 72 days) and a decrease in VE (2180 days) in contrast with control (5328 days) and K409A (9590 days) groups. No survival differences were observed in aged male mice from both HIII and LIII in all experimental groups (Figure 1C and D).
Table 1

Mean survival time (days) and environmental variance of H III and L III mice

  

♀ HIIIadult

♀ HIIIaged

♀ LIIIaged

♂ HIIIaged

♂ LIIIaged

Control

MST

614 ± 177

531 ± 123

442 ± 72

469 ± 84

575 ± 97

VE

31473

15294

5329

7141

9534

 

(n = 4)

(n = 6)

(n = 5)

(n = 6)

(n = 7)

WT

MST

466 ± 134*

308 ± 25**

615 ± 46**

403 ± 88

463 ± 141

VE

18182

635

2180

7802

20018

 

(n = 4)

(n = 6)

(n = 5)

(n = 8)

(n = 8)

K 409 A

MST

665 ± 37

492 ± 61

442 ± 97

537 ± 151

496 ± 134

VE

1422

3823

9591

23097

18093

  

(n = 4)

(n = 5)

(n = 5)

(n = 7)

(n = 8)

Mean survival time (MST) and environmental variance (VE) are shown for control, WT (native Hsp65) and K409A (mutant K409A Hsp65) injected mice groups, males (♂) and females (♀). The values are displayed as plus/minus standard deviation. The number of subject used for each treatment is indicated in parenthesis. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 related to the control of each mice group.

Figure 1

Mean survival time of aged mice inoculated with Hsp65 proteins. Female HIII(A) and LIII(B), and male HIII(C) and LIII(D) animals were intraperitoneally injected with 2.5 μg/animal of WT or K409A with 270-days old (dotted line); whereas control mice received PBS. **p < 0.01 (log rank test Mantel-Cox). The control group was used as reference for statistical analysis.

Since the lifespan of aged HIII females (270-days old) was shortened after WT Hsp65 inoculation, we asked whether the same effect could be observed in adult HIII female mice (120-days old) injected with Hsp65 (Figure 2). Adult HIII female mice showed a MST reduction after WT protein administration (466 ± 134 days; p < 0.01) when compared to K409A injected group (665 ± 37 days). The first death occurred 247 days after inoculation of the native molecule, and the environmental variance was lower in mutant- (1422 days, 22-fold less) and WT-inoculated animals (18181 days, about 2-fold less) compared to control group (31473 days).
Figure 2

WT Hsp65 protein influences on survival of adult H III female mice. Female adults mice were intraperitoneally inoculated with 2.5 μg/animal of WT, K409A proteins, or PBS (control group) at 120-days old (dotted line). *p < 0.05 (log rank test Mantel-Cox). The control group was used as reference for the statistical analysis.

It is noteworthy that in mice from both lines and ages no weight loss, piloerection or ascites were detected.

Anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 antibody production are altered after WT Hsp65 injection

Since the antibody production against heat shock proteins are involved in autoimmune processes, we measured the anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 IgG1 and IgG2a isotypes production after WT and point-mutated Hsp65 inoculation. In aged HIII female mice, WT and K409A inoculation caused a 4.5-fold increase in anti-Hsp65 IgG1 production (p < 0.01) (Figure 3A), compared to pre-immune animals (zero days), at fourteen and seven days post-inoculation, respectively. Despite the reduction observed in IgG2a anti-Hsp65 (Figure 3A) and IgG1 anti-DNA (Figure 3B) observed in aged HIII female mice, the non-inoculated group (control) also showed this decrease, possibly indicating an environmental interference non-related with the protein injection. No differences in IgG2a anti-DNA production were observed.
Figure 3

Anti-Hsp65 and anti-DNA antibodies production in aged H III female mice. Anti-Hsp65 IgG1 and IgG2a (A), and anti-DNA IgG1 and IgG2a (B) isotype production in the serum of aged mice (3–6 animals/group) inoculated with WT, K409A Hsp65, or PBS (control). Antibody titers were set by ELISA before (day 0) and after 7 and 14 days post Hsp65 inoculation. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 (Two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni multiple comparisons post-test).

Antibody production kinetics analysis of aged HIII female mice shows an increase of the IgG1 anti-Hsp65 (p < 0.01) in the WT-injected group, starting at 2.8 log2 and reaching 5.4 log2 on day fourteen, and 3.3 log2 to 6 log2 in K409A group (p < 0.05) on 7th day post-immunization when compared to pre-immune serum (data not shown).

In adult HIII female mice, the administration of both WT and K409A Hsp65 molecules did not promote alterations in the anti-Hsp65 antibody production kinetics between all experimental groups until 33 days post-inoculation (Figure 4A). However, the anti-DNA titer was increased at 33rd days in WT (p < 0.01) and K409A (p < 0.05) groups (Figure 4B). Regarding aged HIII male mice, the isotypes titration showed only increased IgG1 anti-Hsp65 isotype production compared to pre-immune groups at the 14th day after the K409A Hsp65 injection (data not shown).
Figure 4

Anti-Hsp65 and anti-DNA antibodies production in adult H III female mice. Anti-Hsp65 IgG1 and IgG2a (A), and anti-DNA IgG1 and IgG2a (B) isotype production in the serum of adult HIII female mice (4 animals/group) inoculated with WT, K409A Hsp65, or PBS (control). Antibody titers were determined by ELISA before (day 0) and after 13 and 33 days post Hsp65 inoculation. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 (Two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni multiple comparisons post-test).

After the observation of the increased survival of aged LIII female mice injected with WT Hsp65, we investigated the effects of those molecules over the antibody production in low antibody responder mice. No differences were observed in IgG1 (titers range from 3.7 ± 0.8 to 4.2 ± 0.5 log2) and IgG2a (from 5.5 ± 0.8 to 7.0 ± 1.0 log2) anti-Hsp65 or IgG1 (from 2.0 ± 0.4 log2 to 2.5 ± 0.8 log2) and IgG2a (from 2.4 ± 0.5 log2 to 4.0 ± 1.9 log2) anti-DNA production in aged LIII female mice after WT or K409A Hsp65 inoculation (Figure 5A and B). On the other hand, LIII male mice showed elevated levels of IgG2a anti-Hsp65 after 14 days subsequently the WT (p < 0.001) or K409A (p < 0.05) injection (Figure 5C), whereas the anti-DNA data displayed mainly an increase in IgG2a anti-Hsp65 after WT (p < 0.001) and K409A (p < 0.01) inoculation (Figure 5D).
Figure 5

Anti-Hsp65 and anti-DNA antibodies production in aged L III mice. Anti-Hsp65 IgG1 and IgG2a (A and C) and anti-DNA IgG1 and IgG2a (B and D) isotype production in the serum of aged LIII mice (4–8 animals/group, males and females) inoculated with WT, K409A Hsp65, or PBS (control). Antibody titers were determined by ELISA before (day 0) and after 7 and 14 days post-WT or -K409A Hsp65 inoculation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 (Two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni multiple comparisons post-test).

Discussion

Immunological functions may change with aging and lead to a deficient immune response to several infections and vaccines, predisposing the individual to chronic-degenerative processes by the decline of self-tolerance maintenance and loss of tissue integrity, directing to crypt antigens release, amplified bystander activation and molecular mimicry events [2, 41, 42]. Based on the immune alterations observed in the aging process, the reports of higher incidence of chronic-degenerative processes in elders [14, 43] and the deleterious effect of M. leprae Hsp65 administration on murine lupus and autoimmune uveitis [35, 38], we evaluated the interference of WT Hsp65 administration on survival time and correlation with antibody production in HIII and LIII mice. The animals from Selection III are a well-established model to understand the humoral immune response and its influences over the susceptibility to infections [44], autoimmunity [45] and tumorigenesis [46]; they also differ in the response to antigens not related to those used for the selection procedure [47] and present different susceptibility to autoimmune disease [48]. Moreover, HIII and LIII mice are used to verify the influence of genetic alterations over longevity, as demonstrated by the differences between the survival of distinct genetic bidirectional selections: Selection I and II presents different survival between lines and gender and Selection III shows similar mean survival time regardless of sex or linage (HIII: 611 ± 153 days, LIII: 622 ± 166 days) [49, 50].

Native Hsp65 effects on survival of aged and adults HIII female mice indicate the immunological interference of the Hsp65 molecule in this model. It reduced the survival of HIII female mice, mainly in young aged (270-days old), with first death occurring 18 days after WT administration, whereas for adults HIII female mice (120-days old) it occurred 247 days post-injection, a period 14-times greater than the aged mice. In opposition, WT-inoculated aged LIII female mice presented higher MST (615 ± 46 days, p < 0.01) compared to mutant and control groups (442 ± 97 and 441 ± 72 days, respectively). Despite the differences of the maximal survival time in control groups (Additional file 1), we can take these data in account as the maximal survival obtained was within to those previously observed [50], with 501 days in aged LIII female and 759 days in aged LIII male mice. The maximal survival of control group of HIII female (763 and 765 days) or LIII male (759 days) showed a significant difference because some mice died with extreme lifespan. Despite the low number of animals used (restricted by the ethics committee) the results demonstrated that the M. leprae Hsp65 injection could alter the survival, reducing MST in HIII and augmenting in LIII female mice.

Considering that LIII line shows an 18-fold reduction in the antibody production and low T cell proliferation [51], it is possible to consider that the humoral response of LIII mice against Hsp65 is reduced, resulting in an easy management by the system to return to homeostasis. The same could be true for other mice lines with lower antibody response compared to HIII mice, like Swiss albino mice (foundation of Selection III lines) [47]. Contrary, the high responder rate of the immunological system in HIII female mice after WT injection, despite the antibody production rate, could disrupt the homeostasis and lead to a reduced survival. Homeostasis imbalance due to aging process in association with the interference of Hsp65 inoculation could explain the higher decrease in survival of HIII aged female. In spite of our animal model do not spontaneously develop autoimmune processes, the reduced survival time of HIII female mice matches to the experiments involving lupus-prone mice [35] and models of experimental autoimmune uveitis in mice [38], and reassure the involvement of Hsp in chronic-degenerative processes. The control expression and the rupture of Hsp65 balance in SLE development were ascertained through the approach of inductive disequilibrium of physiological and immune states by homologous Hsp [52] and the same could be true for the current study.

Since High and Low mice lines differ, respectively, to high or low antibody responses, the anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 IgG isotypes production were analyzed after WT or K409A Hsp65 inoculation. HIII and LIII mice, both genders, presented slightly higher production of IgG2a anti-Hsp65 and anti-DNA related to the IgG1 isotype. This balance towards a Th1 response may indicate a natural pro-inflammatory status in these strains which is confirmed by the relative easy way to induce adjuvant arthritis in HIII mice [53]. The time-course analyses of immunoglobulin production did not show significant intragroup differences, which might be related to the absence of a strong specific response to these proteins demonstrated by the low antibody titers even 30 days after the protein inoculation and because this is not an immunization process. Compared to pre-immune mice, aged HIII females presented an increase of anti-Hsp65 IgG1 in the group treated with WT or K409A Hsp65 and a non-related reduction of IgG2a. In murines, the IgG1 and IgG2a functions are dependent on the cells activation threshold determined by the affinity of antibodies and the expression of inhibitors/activators receptors [54]. The amplification of anti-Hsp65 IgG1 antibody (approximately 4-times) should be related with a switch to a Th2 response, previously observed in the immunosenescence process [2]. It also could correlate to the precocious death of aged HIII female mice, since the augment of Th2 cytokines, despite its regulatory effect, are involved in some diseases like asthma, allergies and autoimmunities [55, 56].

Confirmed the M. leprae Hsp65 effect on reduced survival in aged HIII female mice, it was evaluated whether the anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 antibody production were age-dependent by comparing the IgG isotypes with adults HIII female mice. They did not present intergroup changes in kinetics of anti-DNA or anti-Hsp65 antibodies production, but adult HIII female mice showed increase in IgG2a titers after Hsp65 molecules injection. The IgG2a isotype titers are remarkably lower in adult mice compared to aged ones as an indicative of a better balance of Th1/Th2 response and maintaining homeostasis of the immune system, as demonstrated by the 13-times later death in adult HIII females after WT inoculation compared to old mice.

This dominating effect observed in the survival time of aged mice emphasizes the involvement of the Hsp65 molecule in aging processes. The effect of native molecule was gender-specific, as demonstrated by the unaltered MST in aged male mice (HIII and LIII) inoculated with both proteins, and potentially related with the differential regulation of the immunological system by sexual hormones [57], as the dimorphism between gender is positively linked with different susceptibility for infections, autoimmune diseases and tumor incidence [40, 58]. Sexual hormones (mostly estrogen but also progesterone and testosterone) affect immune cells quantitatively and qualitatively and impact on cytokine production [59]. Females have higher plasma concentrations of immunoglobulin, increased number and strong activation of CD4+ T cells, elevated levels of Th1 cytokines (IgG2a production) and stronger primary and secondary antibody response [60, 61]. Indeed, the higher incidence of SLE in females reflects the gender dimorphism [62, 63].

It should also be considered the animal model used to test the relationship of Hsp and aging. The opposite phenotypes of antibody production in HIII and LIII mice include immune response to a wide range of antigens [47]. The F0 - foundation population - of Selection III mice are genetically heterogeneous: the phenotypic variance (VP) is due to the sum of the genetic variance (VG), and the environmental variance (VE) emerges by all the causes of variability resulting from the environment. The bi-directional selection resulted in a progressive increase (HIII mice) or a decrease (LIII mice) in mean antibody response, followed by the decline of VG in both lines [47, 64]. Therefore, the alterations provoked by WT or K409A Hsp65 administration (the environmental feature applied during the experiments) provide the variance in our experimental model. After WT inoculation, a great reduction in variance value was observed in aged female HIII (VE = 635 versus VE = 15293 of the control group) than LIII mice (VE = 2180 versus VE controls = 5328), showing the impact of this molecule administration over the potential of death phenotype (MST = 308 ± 25 in aged HIII and MST = 615 ± 46 in aged LIII female mice). We cannot exclude the interference of others genetic factors occurred during the selective breeding, and a gender-effect that may affect the response in HIII and LIII mice. Since it was proposed that the presence of anti-Hsp60 autoantibodies, innate risk factor of atherosclerosis in adulthood, may be an inherited trait, we are conducting studies about the effect of Hsp65 in (HIIIxLIII)F1 hybrids to clarify the genetic influence of this susceptibility [65].

Mechanisms underlying the distinct effects of the native Hsp65 on survival of HIII and LIII mice, and the comparison between them and mutant injected individuals are under evaluation. Preliminary histopathological analysis with some control- and WT-injected HIII female mice (3 animals/group) indicates that the WT Hsp65 inoculation results in a widespread chronic hepatitis, spleen hyperplasia, and, unlike LIII female, higher degree of nephrosis and chronic nephritis with inflammatory infiltration of plasma cells, macrophages and lymphocytes (data not shown), characteristics also present in human lupus nephritis [66]. Studies of immune cells alterations in spleen and blood samples of aged HIII female mice injected with M. leprae Hsp65 are in progress. The initial results shows increased splenic B cells percentage, amplified expression of CD45RA and CD154 in CD4+ T cells, reflecting on the augmented anti-Hsp65 IgG1 isotype production observed here, and amplified surface expression of CD11b and CD11c in blood monocytes.

The adaptive management of biological systems according to environmental changes is essential for the organism survival and Hsp molecules can interfere with immune phenotypes submitted to independent polygenic control. The aging process presents an impaired cellular homeostasis and the Hsp presentation by antigen presenting cells may be diminished, being responsible for the decline in immunoregulation through the recognizing of self Hsp [67]. On the other hand, an amplified expression of stress proteins and his antigenic determinants can evolve to a pathogenic or regulation of chronic-degenerative processes [6870]. Taking together, these facts explain the pleiotropic effects of Hsp65 on biological systems and its wide actions over different cell types and production of other molecules. Based on pleiotropy, the Theory of Aging proposed by George C. Williams suggests that some genes responsible for increased fitness in young fertile individuals may contribute to the reduction of such capacity in later life [71]. Then, it is conceivable that selection for high antibody production genes, essential for the immune protection through the life of an individual, can be one of the factors that allows Hsp65 act on the immune or physiological imbalance later in life. As previously reported by our group, the WT Hsp65 passive administration affects the endogenous balance by increase the entropy of the individual system; the linear equation proposed (y = a + Δi) shows that the immunological history (y) is unique, irreversible and cumulative [35]. In this study, the animal model employed is not naturally predisposed to autoimmunity, so “a” should include the potential advent of chronic-degenerative processes in aging and “i” consists by the sum of the environmental factors that modulate the entropy: age, gender, antibody production rate, and possible cellular and molecular alterations established in Selection III after Hsp65 administration. All these elements interfere in how Hsp65 interact with the immune system; consequently, the greater their influence, greater the entropic energy, hindering the recovery of homeostasis and contributing to the deaths of HIII female mice.

Despite the absence of strikingly differences in antibody production in our experiments, perhaps the 2-fold higher antibodies production in HIII females compared to males [47], associated with the senescent immune system and influenced by hormones, are sufficient to induce frailty after WT administration. In parallel, the high antibodies production rate in HIII, besides increasing the system entropy, can result in reduced antibody affinity for the protein, facilitating its subsequent binding to self-antigens. In case of imbalance due to the overstimulation by stress or inflammation, autoimmune diseases may emerge or aggravate [35, 52]. The opposed occurs in LIII females, which presented increased survival when injected with the native molecule, suggesting that the low immunoglobulin production may favor the control of immune system overstimulation.

We do not observed any signs of disease development during the survival time assay and this be correlated with the incapacity of the mycobacterial Hsp65 alone to induce, in some cases, autoimmunity. In an experiment of arthritis induction by Complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) replaced with the whole mycobacterium [72], the intradermal injection induced arthritic lesions at the same degree as CFA in ankle joints, with the production of anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 in rats. Thus, the not remarkable increase of anti-Hsp65 antibodies presented by HIII and LIII mice may be responsible for the absence of disease.

More than a phenotypic effect by the antibody production against WT Hsp65, the extended pleiotropic effect of this protein over the immune system results in strengthening of naturally established disorders in aged HIII female mice who possibly present a natural higher degree of entropy. In addition, the age-remodeled immune system already shows a major entropy level and the injection of M. leprae WT Hsp65 in females reinforce an imbalance that does not resemble the young individuals, originating disorganizations and irreversible processes leading to death.

Conclusions

Here we verified in an aging mice model the role of M. leprae Hsp65 in the aggravation of phenotypes, as observed in SLE and experimental autoimmune uveitis, and outlined its interference mainly in aged HIII female inducing precocious death. We assume that this effect is associated to the aging process and related to gender-effect instead of the amount of antibody produced in these mice lines. Studies of cellular and cytokines alterations after the Hsp65 administration in Selection III mice and its (HIIIxLIII)F1 hybrid mice are in progress to elucidate the mechanisms by which this heat shock protein and its responses act in the immune system of aged individuals.

Methods

Expression of the recombinants M. leprae Hsp65 in Escherichia coli and purification

Clone pIL161, containing the coding sequence of the M. leprae WT Hsp65 and its point-mutated form K409A [36] were amplified in E. coli DH5a cells. Expression and purification of the recombinant Hsp65 WT and K409A was described elsewhere [35].

Animals

The genetically heterogeneous selected mice for High (HIII) or Low (LIII) antibody production were bred in the animal facility of the Immunogenetic Laboratory and maintained at the animal facility of the Immunochemistry Laboratory, both in Butantan Institute. They were housed in groups of four to five in plastic cages filled with hardwood bedding, provided with water and rodent chow ad libitum, in a room with 12-h light/dark cycle, controlled pressure, humidity and temperature (24 ± 2°C). All procedures are in agreement to the International Animal Welfare Recommendations [73] and the experiments are in conformity with the Ethical Principles in Animal Research, adopted by the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation, and was approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Research of Butantan Institute (CEUAIB #475/08).

Administration of the WT and K409A Hsp65 molecules

Male and female HIII and LIII mice at the age of 120- or 270-days old (named here “adult” or “aged” mice, respectively) were inoculated intraperitonially with a single dose of 2.5 μg of WT or K409A Hsp65 of M. leprae in 0.2 mL of phosphate buffer saline pH 7.4 (PBS); as controls, mice were injected with 0.2 mL PBS. In this study it is important to highlight that the periodically bleedings were performed at different time points in aged and adult female mice; from previously observations that aged HIII female animals death started 18 days after the WT Hsp65 administration (bleedings occurred at seven and at fourteen days post proteins administration). Differently, adult HIII female individuals, which presented an extended survival time after the WT Hsp65 inoculation, were bled after fourteen and thirty-three days after the proteins injection; this longer interval was used to avoid external stress stimuli that could influence the experiment. The serum samples were stored at -20°C until antibody titration. Each animal was observed until death for the designing of the longevity curve and examined for clinical signs that include development of ascites and lethargy.

Titration of anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 antibodies

Levels of anti-DNA and anti-Hsp65 IgG1 and IgG2a isotypes titers were set by indirect ELISA as describe before [35] and expressed as log2 of the reciprocal serum dilution giving an absorbance value of 20% of the saturation level.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 5.0 software. The antibody dosages are expressed as mean ± SD. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons post-test were used to evaluate the antibody production between mice from control, WT and K409A groups. Kaplan-Meier plot for mean survival time (MST) was analyzed by log-rank test (Mantel-Cox) comparing the MST with age, dose or administration period of WT or K409A rHsp65. For all data, minimum statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Institute of Science and Technology in Toxins (INCTTOX), São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) and the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) and Center of Toxins, Immune-Response and Cell Signaling CeTICS – FAPESP 2013/07467-1. EJB and EBM are recipients of an FAPESP fellowship. MDF, NS, VB and OAS are researchers of CNPq-Brazil. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratório de Imunoquímica, Instituto Butantan
(2)
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Avenida Albert Einstein
(3)
Laboratório de Imunogenética, Instituto Butantan
(4)
Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia,UNIFESP

References

  1. Vo TK, Godard P, de Saint-Hubert M, Morrhaye G, Swine C, Geenen V, Martens HJ, Debacq-Chainiaux F, Toussaint O: Transcriptomic biomarkers of the response of hospitalized geriatric patients with infectious diseases. Immun Ageing. 2010, 7: 9-10.1186/1742-4933-7-9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ginaldi L, Loreto MF, Corsi MP, Modesti M, de Martinis M: Immunosenescence and infectious diseases. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3: 851-857. 10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01443-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Prelog M: Aging of the immune system: a risk factor for autoimmunity?. Autoimmun Rev. 2006, 5: 136-139. 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.09.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cossarizza A, Ortolani C, Monti D, Franceschi C: Cytometric analysis of immunosenescence. Cytometry. 1997, 27: 297-313. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19970401)27:4<297::AID-CYTO1>3.0.CO;2-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Franceschi C, Bonafe M, Valensin S, Olivieri F, de Luca M, Ottaviani E, de Benedictis G: Inflamm-aging. An evolutionary perspective on immunosenescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000, 908: 244-254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Licastro F, Candore G, Lio D, Porcellini E, Colonna-Romano G, Franceschi C, Caruso C: Innate immunity and inflammation in ageing: a key for understanding age-related diseases. Immun Ageing. 2005, 2: 8-10.1186/1742-4933-2-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasler P, Zouali M: Immune receptor signaling, aging, and autoimmunity. Cell Immunol. 2005, 233: 102-108. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2005.04.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Janssens JP, Krause KH: Pneumonia in the very old. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004, 4: 112-124. 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)00931-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lynch JP, Walsh EE: Influenza: evolving strategies in treatment and prevention. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2007, 28: 144-158. 10.1055/s-2007-976487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouree P: Immunity and immunization in elderly. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2003, 51: 581-585. 10.1016/j.patbio.2003.09.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang HG, Grizzle WE: Aging, immunity, and tumor susceptibility. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2003, 23: 83-102. 10.1016/S0889-8561(02)00085-1. viView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Trzonkowski P, Mysliwska J, Pawelec G, Mysliwski A: From bench to bedside and back: the SENIEUR Protocol and the efficacy of influenza vaccination in the elderly. Biogerontology. 2009, 10: 83-94. 10.1007/s10522-008-9155-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson SA, Cambier JC: Ageing, autoimmunity and arthritis: senescence of the B cell compartment - implications for humoral immunity. Arthritis Res Ther. 2004, 6: 131-139. 10.1186/ar1180.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yung RL, Julius A: Epigenetics, aging, and autoimmunity. Autoimmunity. 2008, 41: 329-335. 10.1080/08916930802024889.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tower J: Hsps and aging. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2009, 20: 216-222. 10.1016/j.tem.2008.12.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Morimoto RI: Proteotoxic stress and inducible chaperone networks in neurodegenerative disease and aging. Genes Dev. 2008, 22: 1427-1438. 10.1101/gad.1657108.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pockley AG: Heat shock proteins as regulators of the immune response. Lancet. 2003, 362: 469-476. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14075-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Srivastava P: Roles of heat-shock proteins in innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002, 2: 185-194. 10.1038/nri749.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Welch WJ: Heat shock proteins functioning as molecular chaperones: their roles in normal and stressed cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993, 339: 327-333. 10.1098/rstb.1993.0031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindquist S, Craig EA: The heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 1988, 22: 631-677. 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.003215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wong HR: Heat shock proteins. Facts, thoughts, and dreams. A. De Maio. Shock 11:1–12, 1999. Shock. 1999, 12: 323-325.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mayer MP: Gymnastics of molecular chaperones. Mol Cell. 2010, 39: 321-331. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bukau B, Weissman J, Horwich A: Molecular chaperones and protein quality control. Cell. 2006, 125: 443-451. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Thole JE, Hindersson P, de Bruyn J, Cremers F, van der Zee J, de Cock H, Tommassen J, van Eden W, van Embden JD: Antigenic relatedness of a strongly immunogenic 65 kDA mycobacterial protein antigen with a similarly sized ubiquitous bacterial common antigen. Microb Pathog. 1988, 4: 71-83. 10.1016/0882-4010(88)90049-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kong TH, Coates AR, Butcher PD, Hickman CJ, Shinnick TM: Mycobacterium tuberculosis expresses two chaperonin-60 homologs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90: 2608-2612. 10.1073/pnas.90.7.2608.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Qamra R, Mande SC: Crystal structure of the 65-kilodalton heat shock protein, chaperonin 60.2, of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 8105-8113. 10.1128/JB.186.23.8105-8113.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Qamra R, Srinivas V, Mande SC: Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL homologues unusually exist as lower oligomers and retain the ability to suppress aggregation of substrate proteins. J Mol Biol. 2004, 342: 605-617. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaufmann SH: Heat shock proteins and the immune response. Immunol Today. 1990, 11: 129-136.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bonato VL, Lima VM, Tascon RE, Lowrie DB, Silva CL: Identification and characterization of protective T cells in hsp65 DNA-vaccinated and Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected mice. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 169-175.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wick G, Perschinka H, Millonig G: Atherosclerosis as an autoimmune disease: an update. Trends Immunol. 2001, 22: 665-669. 10.1016/S1471-4906(01)02089-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Georgopoulos C, McFarland H: Heat shock proteins in multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases. Immunol Today. 1993, 14: 373-375. 10.1016/0167-5699(93)90135-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Afek A, George J, Gilburd B, Rauova L, Goldberg I, Kopolovic J, Harats D, Shoenfeld Y: Immunization of low-density lipoprotein receptor deficient (LDL-RD) mice with heat shock protein 65 (HSP-65) promotes early atherosclerosis. J Autoimmun. 2000, 14: 115-121. 10.1006/jaut.1999.0351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. de Kleer IM, Kamphuis SM, Rijkers GT, Scholtens L, Gordon G, de Jager W, Hafner R, van de Zee R, van Eden W, Kuis W, Prakken BJ: The spontaneous remission of juvenile idiopathic arthritis is characterized by CD30+ T cells directed to human heat-shock protein 60 capable of producing the regulatory cytokine interleukin-10. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 48: 2001-2010. 10.1002/art.11174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hooper PL, Hooper JJ: Loss of defense against stress: diabetes and heat shock proteins. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005, 7: 204-208. 10.1089/dia.2005.7.204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Marengo EB, de Moraes LV, Faria M, Fernandes BL, Carvalho LV, Tambourgi DV, Rizzo LV, Portaro FC, Camargo AC, Sant’anna OA: Administration of M. leprae Hsp65 interferes with the murine lupus progression. PLoS One. 2008, 3: e3025-10.1371/journal.pone.0003025.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Portaro FC, Hayashi MA, de Arauz LJ, Palma MS, Assakura MT, Silva CL, de Camargo AC: The Mycobacterium leprae hsp65 displays proteolytic activity. Mutagenesis studies indicate that the M. leprae hsp65 proteolytic activity is catalytically related to the HslVU protease. Biochemistry. 2002, 41: 7400-7406. 10.1021/bi011999l.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Marengo EB, de Moraes LV, Melo RL, Balan A, Fernandes BL, Tambourgi DV, Rizzo LV, Sant’Anna OA: A Mycobacterium leprae Hsp65 mutant as a candidate for mitigating lupus aggravation in mice. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e24093-10.1371/journal.pone.0024093.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Marengo EB, Commodaro AG, Peron JP, de Moraes LV, Portaro FC, Belfort R, Rizzo LV, Sant’Anna OA: Administration of Mycobacterium leprae rHsp65 aggravates experimental autoimmune uveitis in mice. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e7912-10.1371/journal.pone.0007912.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pan Z, Chang C: Gender and the regulation of longevity: implications for autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2012, 11: A393-A403. 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.12.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ottonello L, Frumento G, Arduino N, Bertolotto M, Mancini M, Sottofattori E, Dallegri F, Cutolo M: Delayed neutrophil apoptosis induced by synovial fluid in rheumatoid arthritis: role of cytokines, estrogens, and adenosine. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 966: 226-231. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04219.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Olson JK, Croxford JL, Miller SD: Virus-induced autoimmunity: potential role of viruses in initiation, perpetuation, and progression of T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease. Viral Immunol. 2001, 14: 227-250. 10.1089/088282401753266756.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McElhaney JE, Effros RB: Immunosenescence: what does it mean to health outcomes in older adults?. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009, 21: 418-424. 10.1016/j.coi.2009.05.023.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Dorshkind K, Montecino-Rodriguez E, Signer RA: The ageing immune system: is it ever too old to become young again?. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009, 9: 57-62. 10.1038/nri2471.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mouton D, Stiffel C, Biozzi G: Genetic factors of immunity against infection. Ann Inst Pasteur Immunol. 1985, 136D: 131-141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. de Franco M, Gille-Perramant MF, Mevel JC, Couderc J: T helper subset involvement in two high antibody responder lines of mice (Biozzi mice): HI (susceptible) and HII (resistant) to collagen-induced arthritis. Eur J Immunol. 1995, 25: 132-136. 10.1002/eji.1830250123.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ibanez OM, Mouton D, Ribeiro OG, Bouthillier Y, de Franco M, Cabrera WH, Siqueira M, Biozzi G: Low antibody responsiveness is found to be associated with resistance to chemical skin tumorigenesis in several lines of Biozzi mice. Cancer Lett. 1999, 136: 153-158. 10.1016/S0304-3835(98)00317-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Biozzi G, Mouton D, Sant’Anna OA, Passos HC, Gennari M, Reis MH, Ferreira VC, Heumann AM, Bouthillier Y, Ibanez OM, Stiffel C, Siqueira M: Genetics of immunoresponsiveness to natural antigens in the mouse. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1979, 85: 31-98. 10.1007/978-3-642-67322-1_2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson SJ, Rook GA, Brealey RJ, van der Zee R, Elson CJ: Autoimmune reactions to heat-shock proteins in pristane-induced arthritis. Eur J Immunol. 1990, 20: 2479-2484. 10.1002/eji.1830201118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Covelli V, Mouton D, di Majo V, Bouthillier Y, Bangrazi C, Mevel JC, Rebessi S, Doria G, Biozzi G: Inheritance of immune responsiveness, life span, and disease incidence in interline crosses of mice selected for high or low multispecific antibody production. J Immunol. 1989, 142: 1224-1234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Doria G, Biozzi G, Mouton D, Covelli V: Genetic control of immune responsiveness, aging and tumor incidence. Mech Ageing Dev. 1997, 96: 1-13. 10.1016/S0047-6374(96)01854-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Reis MH, Ibanez OM, Cabrera WH, Ribeiro OG, Mouton D, Siqueira M, Couderc J: T-helper functions in lines of mice selected for high or low antibody production (Selection III): modulation by anti-CD4+ monoclonal antibody. Immunology. 1992, 75: 80-85.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Prohaszka Z, Fust G: Immunological aspects of heat-shock proteins-the optimum stress of life. Mol Immunol. 2004, 41: 29-44. 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.02.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Jensen JR, Peters LC, Borrego A, Ribeiro OG, Cabrera WH, Starobinas N, Siqueira M, Ibanez OC, de Franco M: Involvement of antibody production quantitative trait loci in the susceptibility to pristane-induced arthritis in the mouse. Genes Immun. 2006, 7: 44-50. 10.1038/sj.gene.6364271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV: Fcgamma receptors: old friends and new family members. Immunity. 2006, 24: 19-28. 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.11.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Oflazoglu E, Swart DA, Anders-Bartholo P, Jessup HK, Norment AM, Lawrence WA, Brasel K, Tocker JE, Horan T, Welcher AA, Fitzpatrick DR: Paradoxical role of programmed death-1 ligand 2 in Th2 immune responses in vitro and in a mouse asthma model in vivo. Eur J Immunol. 2004, 34: 3326-3336. 10.1002/eji.200425197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Muto G, Kotani H, Kondo T, Morita R, Tsuruta S, Kobayashi T, Luche H, Fehling HJ, Walsh M, Choi Y, Yoshimura A: TRAF6 Is Essential for Maintenance of Regulatory T Cells That Suppress Th2 Type Autoimmunity. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e74639-10.1371/journal.pone.0074639.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Bouman A, Schipper M, Heineman MJ, Faas MM: Gender difference in the non-specific and specific immune response in humans. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2004, 52: 19-26. 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2004.00177.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Singh MP, Rai AK, Singh SM: Gender dimorphism in the progressive in vivo growth of a T cell lymphoma: involvement of cytokines and gonadal hormones. J Reprod Immunol. 2005, 65: 17-32. 10.1016/j.jri.2004.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Oertelt-Prigione S: The influence of sex and gender on the immune response. Autoimmun Rev. 2011, 11: A479-A485.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Amadori A, Zamarchi R, de Silvestro G, Forza G, Cavatton G, Danieli GA, Clementi M, Chieco-Bianchi L: Genetic control of the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio in humans. Nat Med. 1995, 1: 1279-1283. 10.1038/nm1295-1279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Michaels RM, Rogers KD: A sex difference in immunologic responsiveness. Pediatrics. 1971, 47: 120-123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ishikawa S, Akakura S, Abe M, Terashima K, Chijiiwa K, Nishimura H, Hirose S, Shirai T: A subset of CD4+ T cells expressing early activation antigen CD69 in murine lupus: possible abnormal regulatory role for cytokine imbalance. J Immunol. 1998, 161: 1267-1273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Struhar D, Harbeck R, Cherniack R: Elastic properties of the excised lungs of NZB/W mice and their correlation with histopathologic changes. Lung. 1988, 166: 107-112. 10.1007/BF02714034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sant’Anna OA, Ferreira VC, Reis MH, Gennari M, Ibanez OM, Esteves MB, Mouton D, Biozzi G: Genetic parameters of the polygenic regulation of antibody responsiveness to flagellar and somatic antigens of salmonellae. J Immunogenet. 1982, 9: 191-205. 10.1111/j.1744-313X.1982.tb00791.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Patil SA, Katyayani S, Sood A, Kavitha AK, Marimuthu P, Taly AB: Possible significance of anti-heat shock protein (HSP-65) antibodies in autoimmune myasthenia gravis. J Neuroimmunol. 2013, 257: 107-109. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2013.02.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Lightstone L: Lupus nephritis: where are we now?. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2010, 22: 252-256. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283386512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. van Eden W, Wick G, Albani S, Cohen I: Stress, heat shock proteins, and autoimmunity: how immune responses to heat shock proteins are to be used for the control of chronic inflammatory diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007, 1113: 217-237. 10.1196/annals.1391.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Rajaiah R, Moudgil KD: Heat-shock proteins can promote as well as regulate autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2009, 8: 388-393. 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.12.004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Nishikawa H, Kato T, Tawara I, Saito K, Ikeda H, Kuribayashi K, Allen PM, Schreiber RD, Sakaguchi S, Old LJ, Shiku H: Definition of target antigens for naturally occurring CD4(+) CD25(+) regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2005, 201: 681-686. 10.1084/jem.20041959.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Paul AG, van Kooten PJ, van Eden W, van der Zee R: Highly autoproliferative T cells specific for 60-kDa heat shock protein produce IL-4/IL-10 and IFN-gamma and are protective in adjuvant arthritis. J Immunol. 2000, 165: 7270-7277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Williams GC: Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution. 1957, 11: 398-411. 10.2307/2406060.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhou L, Yu Y, Chen L, Zhang P, Wu X, Zhang Y, Yang M, Di J, Jiang H, Wang L: Recombinant mycobacterial HSP65 in combination with incomplete Freund’s adjuvant induced rat arthritis comparable with that induced by complete Freund’s adjuvant. J Immunol Methods. 2012, 386: 78-84. 10.1016/j.jim.2012.09.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Giles AR: Guidelines for the use of animals in biomedical research. Thromb Haemost. 1987, 58: 1078-1084.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Baldon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement