Skip to main content
Download PDF

Investigating the potential of a prematurely aged immune phenotype in severely injured patients as predictor of risk of sepsis

Immunity & Ageing volume 19, Article number: 60 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Traumatic injury elicits a hyperinflammatory response and remodelling of the immune system leading to immuneparesis. This study aimed to evaluate whether traumatic injury results in a state of prematurely aged immune phenotype to relate this to clinical outcomes and a greater risk of developing additional morbidities post-injury.

Methods and findings

Blood samples were collected from 57 critically injured patients with a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 26 (range 15–75 years), mean age of 39.67 years (range 20–84 years), and 80.7% males, at days 3, 14, 28 and 60 post-hospital admission. 55 healthy controls (HC), mean age 40.57 years (range 20–85 years), 89.7% males were also recruited. The phenotype and frequency of adaptive immune cells were used to calculate the IMM-AGE score, an indicator of the degree of phenotypic ageing of the immune system. IMM-AGE was elevated in trauma patients at an early timepoint (day 3) in comparison with healthy controls (p < 0.001), driven by an increase in senescent CD8 T cells (p < 0.0001), memory CD8 T cells (p < 0.0001) and regulatory T cells (p < 0.0001) and a reduction in naïve CD8 T cells (p < 0.001) and overall T cell lymphopenia (p < 0 .0001). These changes persisted to day 60. Furthermore, the IMM-AGE scores were significantly higher in trauma patients (mean score 0.72) that developed sepsis (p = 0.05) in comparison with those (mean score 0.61) that did not.

Conclusions

The profoundly altered peripheral adaptive immune compartment after critical injury can be used as a potential biomarker to identify individuals at a high risk of developing sepsis and this state of prematurely aged immune phenotype in biologically young individuals persists for up to two months post-hospitalisation, compromising the host immune response to infections. Reversing this aged immune system is likely to have a beneficial impact on short- and longer-term outcomes of trauma survivors.

Introduction

For adults aged 40 and below traumatic injury remains the leading cause of death [1]. A systematic review of 52 studies has revealed recent advances in emergency medicine have led to a reduction in mortality rates in traumatised patients directly attributable to the initial act of injury [2]. However, this is accompanied by prolonged recovery time and an increased risk of poor outcomes such as severe sepsis and multi-organ failure (MOF) [3, 4]. Thus, identifying patients at a high risk of sepsis or MOF is imperative to gain further improvements in survival [5]. Furthermore, trauma patients who survive the initial intensive care unit (ICU) stay often do not progress to an optimal recovery, displaying persistent organ dysfunction, poor nutritional status, recurrent infections and subsequent hospital readmissions [6]. The long-term outcomes for trauma survivors are also worrying, 16% of those living with disability are trauma victims and life expectancy is significantly reduced in these patients [7]. There is thus an urgent need for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of trauma in the short and long term.

Traumatic injury initiates the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), a heterogeneous collection of endogenous proteins, lipids and DNA. Via immune activation, DAMPs trigger a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) that is characterised in part by elevated circulating concentrations of a range of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Interleukin IL6, Tumor Necrosis Factor α) [8, 9]. The inflammatory response plays a critical role in the host’s healing process and clearance of infection, but inappropriate persistence of inflammation can promote organ damage and dysfunction. In an attempt to restore homeostasis, the SIRS is accompanied by a compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS), that is associated with raised levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) to restore homeostasis [10]. A shorter period of SIRS and a rapid return to homeostasis is crucial to improving patient outcome post-traumatic injury. An imbalance between SIRS and CARS can result in a state of immune suppression, predisposing to infection [11].

Features of the systemic immune response initiated by a sterile injury include innate immune activation, a decline in neutrophil microbicidal capacity [12], suppressed neutrophil extracellular trap formation [13], impaired cytokine production by monocytes [14] and reduced monocyte HLA-DR expression [15]. Furthermore, limited studies have hinted toward trauma-induced changes in the adaptive immune system, with reports of lymphopenia [16], increased expression of co-inhibitory receptors (PD-1, CTLA4) on the cell surface of T lymphocytes [17] and a shift towards an anti-inflammatory Th2 dominant state [18]. By compromising anti-microbial responses, these changes in the composition and function of the immune system is considered a major factor underlying the increased susceptibility of hospitalised trauma patients to infection. Interestingly, the remodelling of the immune system that occurs following injury is reminiscent of the changes that have been described to occur with advanced age, a phenomenon termed immunesenescence that is thought to contribute to increased infection risk [19].

Key features of an aged immune system are a reduction in naïve T cells, secondary to atrophy of the thymus [20], an increased frequency of T cells with a senescent and pro-inflammatory phenotype [21] and a tendency for a pro-inflammatory differentiation towards Th17 cells [22]. No single feature of the aged immune system is sufficient to indicate the degree of immunesenescence and instead an algorithm that integrates the main elements has been developed, termed the IMM-AGE score [23]. The higher the IMM-AGE score of an individual the higher their mortality risk.

In this prospective observational study of severe trauma patients, we characterise the kinetics and amplitude of changes in the adaptive immune system over time and its relation to patient outcomes. A major health concern post-trauma is an increased risk of sepsis, a life-threatening organ dysfunction induced by an exaggerated, uncontrolled immune response [24]. It is well recognised that early diagnosis is crucial for improving patient outcomes. However, despite enormous efforts, the limited biomarkers that have been recognised have not reached the stage of clinical application due to lack of specificity [25, 26]. Thus, the identification of novel specific biomarkers for sepsis is of prime importance. In this study, we specifically evaluate the predictive value of immune phenotypic biomarkers and the IMM-AGE score in stratifying trauma patients at high risk of sepsis and enable precision medicine.

Methods

Participants and study design

This observational cohort study recruited trauma patients (military and civilian) admitted to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham. Inclusion criteria for trauma patients was an New Injury Severity Score (ISS) of > 15 at recruitment. Clinical data were used to calculate Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) scores for all participants [27, 28]. Additional clinical measures including; ventilator days, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay was also recorded. Sepsis was defined as an infection in the presence of a systemic inflammatory response using Bone’s criteria [29]. The detailed study protocol and design have been published [30]. The study was approved by the NRES Committee South West – Frenchay 11/ SW/0177 and Ministry of Defence REC 116/Gen/10. The age and sex-matched healthy controls were students and staff at the University of Birmingham and older adults were recruited from the community. The exclusion criteria for the healthy participants in this study included: self-reported infections, co-morbidities (e.g. chronic inflammatory conditions, autoimmune disorders, cancer, type 1 diabetes, hypertension) and the use of any medication known to influence immune function (e.g. immune suppressants).

Blood sampling and haematological analysis

Blood samples (6 ml) were collected from trauma patients at four time points (3 days, 14 days, 28 days and 60 days post-hospitalisation) in BD vacutainers containing lithium heparin for trauma patients, and at one timepoint from healthy control participants. Complete blood differential counts were measured in whole blood using a haematology analyser.

Isolation and freezing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by density centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque™ PLUS (GE Healthcare, UK) as previously described [31]. Isolated PBMCs were frozen by re-suspending a cells in freezing medium consisting of 10% DMSO (Sigma Aldrich, UK) in heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Biosera, UK) and stored at -80 °C until further analysis.

T and B cell subset phenotyping

Frozen PBMCs were thawed at 37 °C and washed in 10 ml of RPMI-1640 containing FCS (10%), prior to resuspension in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 1 × 106 cells/ml. For the identification of T cell subsets, samples were stained for 30 min at 4 °C with combinations the following antibodies: anti-human CD3 PE cy7 (clone: UCHT1; Thermo Fischer, UK), anti-human CD4 Violet (clone: RPA-T4; Thermo Fischer, UK), anti-human CD8 PE (clone:UCHT4; Immunotools, Germany), anti-human CCR7 FITC (clone:150,503;R and D Systems, UK), anti-human CD45RA APC (clone: HI100; Biolegend), anti-human PTK7 PE (clone:188B; Miltenyi Biotech, Germany), anti-human CD28 APC (clone:CD28.2; BD Biosciences, UK) and anti-human CD57 FITC (clone:HCD57; Thermo Fischer, UK). A combination of anti-human CD19 PE (clone: HIB19; Thermo Fischer,UK), anti-human CD27 Violet (clone: O323; Thermo Fischer,UK) anti-human IgD FITC (clone: 1A6-2; Thermo Fischer, UK), anti-human CD24 FITC (clone:SN3; Thermo Fischer,UK) and anti-human CD38 PEcy7 (clone: HIT2; Thermo Fischer,UK) were used to identify B cell subsets. A viability dye has been used to gate out dead cells during flow cytometric analysis and cell viability ranged between 60 -80% of all cells [32]. Post incubation, cells were washed in PBS twice and were analysed using a CyanTMADP flow cytometer (Dako, USA). Data analysis was performed using Summit V 4.3 software. CD3+ cells were defined as T cells, 10,000 T cells were gated and were divided into CD4+ and CD8+, which were further divided into four subsets based on CD45RA and CCR7 expression and denoted as naive (CD45RA+ CCR7+), central memory (CD45RA− CCR7+), effector memory (CD45RA− CCR7−) and terminally differentiated effector memory (CD45RA+ CCR7−) [gating strategy; Supplementary Fig. 1]. The CD3+ CD4+ CD45RA+ PTK7+ T cells were denoted as recent thymic emigrants and CD28− CD57+ CD3+ cells were denoted as senescent T cells [gating strategy; Fig. 2A]. CD19+ve cells were defined as B cells and 5,000 B cells were divided into naïve (CD27−IgD+), switched memory (CD27+ IgD+), unswitched memory (CD27− IgD+) and regulatory B cells (CD24hi CD38hi) [gating strategy Supplementary Fig. 2]. The absolute numbers of immune cells were calculated in conjunction with lymphocyte counts.

Regulatory T cells

PBMCs (1 × 106 cells/ml) resuspended in 50 µl of PBS were stained with anti-human CD3 PE cy7, anti-human CD4 Violet and anti-human CD25 APC (clone: PC61; Biolegend, UK) for 30 min at 4 °C. Post incubation, the cells were washed in PBS twice and fixed with Foxp3 Fix Perm solution (Thermo Fischer) for 30 min at room temperature, followed by a wash and staining with anti-human Foxp3 PE (clone: PCH101; Thermo Fischer) in diluted permeabilization buffer (Thermo Fischer) for 30 min at 4 °C. Post incubation, the cells were washed and analysed using a Cyan ™ ADP flow cytometer (Dako). Regulatory T cells were defined as CD3+ CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ cells [ gating strategy Supplementary Fig. 1] [32].

Serum cytokine measurement

Blood collected in no anti-coagulant containing BD vacutainers (red)was left for 30 min prior to centrifugation at 1620 × g for 10 min at room temperature. The serum was removed and stored at -80 °C until further analysis. The concentration of serum cytokines (IL6, IL10, TNFα, IL8) was determined using a commercially available magnetic bead multiplex immunoassay (BioRad).

IMM-AGE score calculation

A subset of 8 immune cell types (total T cells, naive CD4 T cells, effector memory CD4 and CD8 T cells, EMRA CD8 T cells, CD28− CD8 T cells, CD57+ CD8 T cells and regulatory T cells) were selected and optimized for the prediction of all-cause mortality in the Framingham’s cohort, which was used to evaluate the original IMM-AGE metric [23]. The chosen cell type frequencies were standardized by a 10% two-tailed trimmed mean and standard deviation. We built a diffusion map trajectory and calculated the IMM-AGE flow scores, which arpseudo-timeo time values corresponding to the relative location of the cells along the trajectory. The beginning of the trajectory was decided by the frequency of CD28 positive cells and the values were scaled to be in the range of [0,1]. Only samples that did not have missing values that are required for the IMM-AGE flow calculation were used.

Data pre-processing and machine learning algorithms for sepsis prediction

We used the Random Forest (RF) machine learning method to identify key immune features associated with the development of sepsis [33]. RF is a decision tree-based machine learning ensemble method that uses a bootstrapping method that generates random samples from the dataset with replacement. Those samples are divided into training and testing samples. The testing samples also called ‘out-of-bag’ (OOB) samples, are used for the model’s prediction performance. RF needs to use the number of trees (ntree) and a number of immune features randomly sampled as candidates at each split (mtry), and these parameters need to be defined. We used ntree = 500 and mtry = square root of variables in our models and finally, we ranked the immune features in decreasing order based on the “mean decrease in accuracy”. Random Forest analysis was performed using the metaboanalyst (v5.0) software [34].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software. Data distribution was examined using Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test. For normally distributed data, a student t-test, or a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc test were performed where appropriate. Univariate linear regressions were performed to test for associations between immune parameters and other variables. The probability value (p value) of the statistical significance of the test was used as p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Participant demographics and clinical characteristics

Fifty-seven adult trauma patients, mean ± S.D age 39.67 ± 18.01 years (range 20 – 84 years; 50 males) with a mean ISS score of 26 ± 12, mean NISS score of 33 ± 15, mean APACHE II score of 24 ± 8, mean SOFA score of 9 ± 4 and mean SAPS2 score of 50 ± 16 were recruited into this study. Improvised Explosive Device (IED) (n = 24; 42.85%), road traffic collision (RTC) (n = 14; 25.1%) and falls (n = 7; 12.5%) were the most common causes of injury. 37 (64.9%) patients developed sepsis. The mean length of hospital stay was 52.83 ± 43.83 days. Additionally, fifty-five healthy age and sex-matched controls, mean age 40.57 ± 20.32 years (range 20–85 years; 49 males) were recruited into the study. None of the healthy controls suffered from chronic diseases.

The impact of traumatic injury on T cell subset distribution

On comparing total T cell numbers in the PBMC fraction between healthy controls and traumatic injury patients at multiple timepoints, significant differences were observed, F = 01.64, p < 0.001, β = 0.09. The total peripheral T cell numbers in trauma participants were lower at day 3 (p < 0.001), day 14 (p < 0.001), day 28 (p < 0.001) time points in comparison with healthy controls, though higher numbers were seen by day 60 (p = 0.04) [Fig. 1A]. We found a negative correlation between ISS and peripheral T cell numbers, R2 = 0.10, p = 0.017 at day3 post-injury [Fig. 1B]. For CD4 T cells numbers, significant differences were observed, were lower in trauma participants at day 3 (p < 0.0001), day 14 (p < 0.0001) and day 28 (p < 0.0001), but no significant differences were observed between trauma participants and controls at day 60 (p = 0.39) [Fig. 1C]. CD8 T cell numbers were also lower in trauma patients at day 3 (p < 0.0001), day 14 (p < 0.0001), day 28 (p < 0.0001) and remained lower at day 60 (p = 0.006) in comparison with healthy controls [Fig. 1D].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The impact of traumatic injury on T cell subset distribution. A Comparison of absolute numbers of T cells between healthy age and sex matched controls ( n = 55) and traumatic injury patients day 3 ( n = 54), day 14 ( n = 38), day 28 ( n = 41) and day 60 ( n = 16) post hospital admission B Scatterplot showing relationship between peripheral T cell frequency and Injury Severity Score (ISS) in trauma patients at day 3 post hospital admission ( n = 52) C absolute numbers of CD4 T cells and D CD8 T cells in healthy age and sex matched controls ( n = 55) and traumatic injury patients day 3 ( n = 54), day 14 ( n = 38), day 28 ( n = 41) and day 60 ( n = 16) post hospital admission. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001

Full size image

Thymic output and Naïve: Memory T cell ratio

To determine the degree of an aged immune phenotype and ultimately calculate the IMM-AGE score we assessed the phenotype and frequency of a range of immune cells known to reflect immune ageing. PTK7 is a marker of recent thymic emigrants (RTE), a subset of T cells that have recently completed maturation in the thymus and have been exported into the periphery [35], their frequency declines with age. We observed a significantly lower frequency of RTEs at day 3 (p = 0.02), day 14 (p = 0.009) and day 28 (p = 0.01) sampling time-points. At day 60 post-hospitalisation, trauma patients presented with frequencies of RTEs that were comparable to those measured in HCs (p = 0.23) [Fig. 2A].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Thymic output and naïve: memory CD4 T cell ratio post-traumatic injury. A Percentage of PTK7+ recent thymic emigrants in the naïve CD4 T cell pool in healthy age and sex-matched controls ( n = 55) and traumatic injury patients on day 3 ( n = 54), day 14 ( n = 38), day 28 ( n = 41) and day 60 (n = 16) post-hospital admission B Representative flow cytometry plot showing T cell subsets identified via expression of CCR7 and CD45RA. Peripheral frequency of C CD4RA+ CCR7+ naïve D Total memory CD4 T cells E CD4RA− CCR7+ central memory F CD4RA− CCR7− effector memory G and CD4RA+ CCR7.− EMRA CD4 T cells in healthy age and sex-matched controls ( n = 55) and traumatic injury patients on day 3 ( n = 54), day 14 ( n = 38), day 28 ( n = 41) and day 60 ( n = 16) post-hospital admission. The mean value is indicated by the bar. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001

Full size image

For naïve CD4 T cell frequencies we found lower values at day 3 (p < 0.001), day 14 (p = 0.009), day 28 (p = 0.06) and day 60 (p = 0.006) [Fig. 2B, C]. Interestingly, a positive association was observed between systemic levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL6 and peripheral naïve CD4 T cells frequency R2 = 0.14; p = 0.05 (data not shown). In contrast, a higher frequency of memory CD4 T cells was observed in trauma patients on day 3 (p < 0.0001), day 14 (p < 0.0001), day 28 (p < 0.0001) and day 60 (p = 0.003) in comparison with healthy controls [Fig. 2D]. The maximum decline in naïve CD4 T cells and accumulation of peripheral memory CD4 T cells was observed at day 14 post-injury. Overall a decline in naïve: memory CD4 T cell ratio was observed in trauma patients at day 3 (p < 0.0001), day 14 (p < 0.0001), day 28 (p < 0.0001) and day 60 (p = 0.0002) [Fig. 2E]. The accumulation of memory T cells was driven by elevated central memory [Fig. 2F] and EMRA CD4 T cells, the latter contains those cells with a senescent phenotype [Fig. 2H]. No effect of trauma was seen on effector memory CD4 T cells [Fig. 2G].

Similar to CD4 T cells, we found a lower frequency of naïve CD8 T cells frequency in trauma patients at day 3 (p < 0.0001), day 14 (p < 0.0001), day 28 (p < 0.0001) and day 60 (p < 0.0001) in comparison with healthy controls [Fig. 3A]. The frequency of memory CD8 T cells was higher in traumatic injury patients at day 3 (p < 0.0001), day 14 (p < 0.0001), day 28 (p < 0.0001) and day 60 (p < 0.0001) in comparison with healthy controls [Fig. 3B]. Overall a decline in the naïve:memory CD8 T cell ratio was observed in trauma participants at day 3 (p < 0.0001), day 14 (p < 0.0001), day 28 (p < 0.0001) and day 60 (p < 0.0001) [Fig. 3C].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Traumatic injury and naïve: memory CD8 T cell ratio. Peripheral frequency of A naïve B Total memory CD8 T cells C Naïve: Memory CD8 T Cell ratio in healthy age and sex-matched controls (n = 55) and traumatic injury patients on day 3 (n = 54), day 14 (n = 38), day 28 (n = 41) and day 60 (n = 16) post-hospital admission. The mean value is indicated by the bar. *** p < 0.001

Full size image

Accumulation of senescent T cells in trauma patients

T cells have a finite replicative potential and repeated cell divisions result in telomere shortening and induction of cell senescence [36]. On investigating whether traumatic injury resulted in the accumulation of senescent (CD28− CD57+) T cells, we observed a significantly higher frequency (data not shown) and absolute numbers [Fig. 4A,B] of senescent CD4 T cells in trauma patients at days 3 (p < 0.0001), 14 (p < 0.0001), 28 (p = 0.001) and 60 (p = 0.007) in comparison with healthy controls. In this study, we have seen significantly higher levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL6 (p < 0.0001), TNFα (p < 0.0001) and CRP (p < 0.0001) in trauma patients in comparison with age-matched healthy controls which persists for up to 60 days post-hospital admission [Table1]. A similar significantly higher frequency (data not shown) and absolute numbers [Fig. 4C] of senescent CD8 T cells was also observed in trauma patients at days 3 (p = 0.006) and 14 (p = 0.04) and returned to similar values at days 28 (p = 0.18) and 60 (p = 0.31) in comparison with healthy controls.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Senescent and regulatory T cells in traumatic injury patients. A Representative flow cytometry plot showing senescent T cell subsets identified via expression of CD57 and CD28 in a healthy control and trauma patient. Absolute numbers of senescent CD28− CD57+ cells in B CD4 T cell C CD8 T cell pool in healthy age and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 55) and traumatic injury patients on day 3 (n = 54), day 14 (n = 41), day 28 (n = 40) and day 60 (n = 19) post-hospital admission. The mean value is indicated by the bar. D Peripheral numbers of Foxp3.+ CD4 T cells in healthy controls and trauma patients. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001

Full size image
Table 1 Participant demographics, clinical scores, peripheral cytokine and hormone levels
Full size table

Regulatory T cells

Foxp3+ CD25+ CD4 T cells have been classified as regulatory T cells that exhibit immunosuppressive properties and play a critical role in restoring immune homeostasis [37]. Relative to healthy controls, we observed an accumulation of regulatory T cells in traumatically injured patients only at 14 days post-injury (p = 0.004), with no significant differences at other time points [Fig. 4E].

B cell subset distribution

Based on CD27 and IgD surface expression, B cells can be divided into three subsets [Fig. 5A]; naïve B cells (CD27− IgD+), switched memory (CD27+ IgD−) and unswitched memory B cells (CD27+ IgD+) [38]. Whilst traumatic injury has no effect upon the absolute B cell numbers [Fig. 5B], a loss of naïve B cells was observed in trauma patients at days 3 (p < 0.0001), 14 (p < 0.0001), 28 (p < 0.0001) and 60 (p = 0.009) post hospitalisation [Fig. 5C]. In contrast, an accumulation of switched memory B cells was observed in trauma patients at days 3 (p < 0.0001), 14 (p < 0.0001), 28 (p < 0.0001) and 60 (p = 0.004) post hospitalisation [Fig. 5D]. No significant differences were found in the frequency of unswitched memory B cells in patients on comparison with healthy controls [Fig. 5E].

Fig. 5
figure 5

The impact of traumatic injury on B cell subset distribution. A Peripheral numbers of CD19+ve B cells in healthy age and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 55) and traumatic injury patients on day 3 (n = 49), day 14 (n = 31), day 28 (n = 38) and day 60 (n = 14) post hospital admission B Representative flow cytometry plots showing B cell subsets identified via expression of CD27 and IgD in a healthy control and trauma patient. Frequency of C naïve B cells (IgD+ CD27−) D switched memory (CD27+ IgD−) E unswitched memory (CD27+ IgD+) F regulatory (CD24hi CD38.hi) B cells in healthy controls and traumatic injury patients. The mean value is indicated by the bar. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001

Full size image

CD19+ CD24hi CD38hi B cells have been identified as regulatory B cells that exert immune suppressive effects, mainly via IL‐10 secretion [ gating strategy supplementary Fig. 2C] [39]. Trauma patients displayed a lower frequency of regulatory B cells at day 3 (p = 0.001), day 28 (p < 0.0001) and day 60 (p = 0.04) post hospitalisation in comparison with controls [Fig. 5F].

Immunological age scoring in trauma patients

IMM-AGE is a recently developed metric that describes an individual’s immune system dynamics in relation to their chronological age [23]. This score predicts all-cause mortality and is thus a composite marker of the degree of ageing of the immune system. IMM-AGE scores for trauma patients were significantly higher than those of healthy controls at day 3 (p < 0.001), day 14 (p < 0.001), day 28 (p < 0.001) and day 60 (p < 0.001) post hospitalisation [Fig. 6A]. Interestingly, we have observed a positive correlation between immunological age (IMM-AGE score) and chronological age in healthy controls, p = 0.02, R2 = 0.12 [Supplementary Fig. 3A], but this was not the case for traumatic injury patients, p = 0.91, R2 = 0.004 [Supplementary Fig. 3B]. Similarly, in modelling the trajectory of the trauma patients and healthy controls we observed that the immune cell trajectory is not ordered by chronological age in trauma patients [Supplementary Fig. 3 C, D]. Furthermore, we found a positive correlation between IMM-AGE scores and clinical parameters in trauma patients: ISS, p = 0.02, R2 = 0.17 [Fig. 6B] and length of ICU stay, p = 0.05, R2 = 0.14 [Fig. 6C]. Lastly, we have also observed a positive association between systemic inflammation and IMM-AGE scores in trauma patients, specifically for IL6 levels and IMM-AGE, p = 0.04, R2 = 0.12 [Fig. 6D].

Fig. 6
figure 6

The IMM-AGE scores in traumatic injury patients. A IMM-AGE scores calculated by the pseudotime algorithm in healthy age and sex matched controls (n = 39) and traumatic injury patients on day 3 (n = 38), day 14 (n = 24), day 28 (n = 34) and day 60 (n = 16) post hospital admission. Scatterplots showing the relationships between IMM-AGE scores and B Injury Severity Score (ISS) C Length of ICU stay (days) D systemic levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL6 in trauma patients on day 3 post hospital admission (n = 33). *** p < 0.001

Full size image

Clinical characteristics and inflammation in trauma patients that develop sepsis

In this study, 67.85% of the trauma patients had at least one septic episode during their hospital stay and mostly in the second-week post hospitalisation. On comparing clinical parameters between trauma patients who had at least one episode of sepsis with those trauma patients who have no septic episodes we observed a significantly higher APACHE II score (p = 0.002), SOFA score (p < 0.0001) and SAPS2 score (p = 0.003) was detected [Table 1]. In addition, compared to non-septic patients, those whose developed sepsis exhibited significantly greater ventilator use (p = 0.007) and an increased ICU (p < 0.0001) and hospital length of stay (p < 0.0001) [Table 1].

On comparing circulating levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, significantly higher circulating CRP levels were observed in both non-sepsis trauma patients (p < 0.0001) and sepsis trauma patients (p < 0.0001) in comparison with healthy controls, also a significantly higher CRP level was observed in sepsis trauma patients in comparison with non-sepsis trauma patients (p = 0.004). Significantly elevated circulating IL6 levels were observed in non-sepsis trauma patients (p < 0.0001) and sepsis trauma patients (p < 0.0001) in comparison with healthy controls. Additionally, significantly higher IL6 levels were observed in sepsis trauma patients when compared to their non-septic counterparts (p < 0.0001) [Table 1]. The circulating TNFα levels were significantly higher in non-sepsis trauma patients (p < 0.0001) and sepsis trauma patients (p < 0.0001) in comparison with healthy controls, also a significantly higher TNFα level was observed in sepsis trauma patients in comparison with non-sepsis trauma patients (p = 0.03) [Table 1]. Lastly, elevated IL10 levels were also observed in sepsis trauma patients in comparison with healthy controls (p < 0.0001) and non-sepsis patients (p = 0.004), no significant differences were observed in IL10 levels between non-sepsis trauma patients and healthy controls (p = 0.58) [Table 1].

The pre-mature aged immune phenotype in trauma patients that develop sepsis

IMM-AGE scores were significantly higher in trauma patients that developed sepsis (p = 0.05) in comparison with those that did not [Fig. 7A] and the participants in the three cohorts followed a different trajectory [Fig. 7B]. Furthermore, in modelling the key immunological and inflammation features that can predict the risk of development of sepsis in trauma patients, the top 15 features corresponding to high or low expression based on random forest modelling are shown in [Fig. 7C]. Low circulating CD4 T cells (p = 0.0007), CD8 T cells (p = 0.0008), naïve T cells (p = 0.008) and recent thymic emigrants (p = 0.01) were the key features in patients that developed sepsis [Fig. 7C, Supplementary Table 1].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Immunological markers as predictors of sepsis in trauma patients. A IMM-AGE scores in healthy age and sex-matched controls (n = 39) and traumatic injury patients without sepsis (n = 15) and traumatic injury patients that develop sepsis (n = 24) post hospital admission. B Immune cells in sepsis trauma patients (green dots), non-sepsis trauma (blue dots) and healthy controls (red dots) yield a continuous trajectory matching the IMM-AGE score C Ranking the top immune and inflammation features and corresponding high or low expression values shown based on the random forest modelling. Each grey dot represents the immune feature (y axis) and corresponding mean decrease accuracy values (in the x axis). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

Ageing is accompanied by significant remodelling of the immune system termed immunesenescence, driven by thymic atrophy, loss of naïve T cells and an accumulation of highly differentiated memory and regulatory T cells and defects in B cell lymphopoiesis [40]. Clinical consequences of an aged immune phenotype include an increased risk of bacterial infections, reactivation of latent viruses, impaired ability to respond to novel pathogens and vaccines and increased risk of chronic inflammatory conditions; resulting in increased morbidity and mortality [41]. Recently a study in mice showed that an aged immune system is sufficient to drive the development of many age-related diseases and accelerated ageing [42]. Understanding the impact of major trauma on immune phenotype may therefore increase understanding of the poor long-term health outcomes of trauma survivors and identify novel therapies to improve their prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report a state of a premature aged immune phenotype post-trauma, a previously unknown underlying pathophysiologic process influencing clinical outcomes in these patients Fig. 8.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Traumatic injury mediated disruption of immune homeostasis and a prematurely aged immune phenotype. Trauma-induced development of systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) in trauma patients as early as 3 days post hospitalisation which persists and a compensatory anti-inflammatory (IL10) which peaks 14 days post hospitalisation. Traumatic injury induces T cell lymphopenia, with a maximum drop in systemic T cells observed 14 days post hospitalisation which persists two months later. Furthermore, trauma-induced activation of the HPA axis resulting in elevated systemic cortisol levels and systemic inflammation (elevated IL6 levels) have been associated with thymic involution in these patients, resulting in a reduced thymic output of naïve T cells. Other changes in T cell subset distribution include; elevated systemic memory T cells and inflammatory senescent T cells correlating with systemic levels of TNFα. An expansion of regulatory T cells occurs in traumatic injury patients that has been associated with elevated systemic IL10 levels. Similar to T cells, a drop in naïve B cells and accumulation of switched memory B cells occurs post-trauma which persists two months later. Trauma-triggered T cell lymphopenia, loss of naïve T cells, accumulation of memory and pro-inflammatory cytokines have been identified as predictive markers for sepsis in trauma patients

Full size image

Here we report low levels of T cells three days post hospitalisation correlating with injury severity which persisted for two months post-trauma. A similar decline in T cells has been reported by other studies in trauma patients [43], patient’s undergoing elective surgery [44], and critically ill patients [45] and has been identified as a predictor of mortality [46]. A potential mechanism driving T cell lymphopenia is the induction of apoptosis driven by upregulation of expression of death factors (FasL) and downregulation of survival factors (bcl2) [44]. On further investigation, we found alterations in T cell subset distribution post-trauma indicative of an aged immune phenotype, including a decline in naïve T cell frequency likely driven by trauma-induced decline in thymic output, as we also recorded a reduced frequency of RTEs. These findings are in line with an animal study using a murine trauma model which reported a loss of thymocytes in the thymus as early as day 3 post-traumatic brain injury which persisted for 60 days post-injury [47]. Although the mechanisms explaining immunological changes post-trauma remains incompletely understood, cytokine-mediated regulation of thymus function has also been widely recognised, specifically IL6 has been reported to exert a thymosuppressive effect [48]. In this study, an association between post-trauma elevated systemic levels of IL6 and loss of naïve T cells was seen. Similar to T cells, we also report for the first time a shift in the B cell compartment towards a drop in systemic naïve B cells and an expansion of switched memory B cells post severe traumatic injury.

Another key hallmark of immune ageing is an accumulation of senescent T cells that in addition to poor proliferative capacity are characterised by secretion of a range of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and growth factors, termed senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [36]. Here we report that an expansion of senescent T cells in traumatic injury patients potentially contributes to the maintained pro-inflammatory environment observed in these patients. On the other hand, regulatory T cells play a crucial role in dampening inflammation and restoring immune homeostasis [49]. In this study, we have observed an expansion of regulatory T cells alongside the expansion of inflammatory senescent T cells, however, we did not assess function and so do not know if their function was compromised. The participants displaying the highest levels of circulating senescent T cells also displayed the highest levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines but no significant relationship was observed between the two. These participants were the same that displayed the highest accumulation of EMRA memory T cells in which is no surprise as it has been published that the majority of senescent T cells are in the memory T cell pool.

These data are in agreement with the results obtained in traumatic brain injury [50] and in critically ill patients [45]. In addition to elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, we also observed an elevation in systemic levels of IL10 post-trauma, which is in line with findings of another study [51] and may underlie the body’s CARS response towards trauma and the increased Treg cells to limit hyper-inflammation.

Overall, this study provides novel evidence of a state of premature aged immune phenotype post-trauma, which has been confirmed by an increase in IMM-AGE scores in a cohort of chronologically young trauma patients. These patients will have none of the confounders of old age that would also increase the IMM-AGE score, such as co-morbidities. The IMM-AGE scores correlated with clinical parameters (injury severity, length of hospital stay), suggesting an influence on clinical outcomes. The failure of clinical trials using pro-inflammatory cytokine inhibitors to improve outcomes for trauma patients [52, 53] suggests that a novel approach is required. Targeting the highly pro-inflammatory senescent T cells, whose frequency we have shown is raised after trauma for extended periods, may represent such an approach. Existing drugs and nutraceuticals able to remove senescent cells, termed senolytics, have already been trialled in conditions such as Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis [54] and chronic kidney disease [55]. Another trial to reduce immune ageing in healthy older men, TRIIM (Thymus Regeneration Immunorestoration and Insulin Mitigation) was the first human clinical trial to show thymic regeneration and reversal of immune ageing. The trial used three agents, metformin, growth hormone and dehydroepiandrosterone given for 12 months [56]. Thus, the prospects of amelioration of an aged immune system in trauma patients by drug repurposing is promising.

Sepsis is defined as a dysregulated host response to infection that has been identified as a leading cause of mortality worldwide post-traumatic injury [57] and enormous efforts have been expended to identify patients at increased risk of developing sepsis. Although previous studies have identified blood lactate [58], red cell distribution [59] and procalcitonin [60] levels as potential prognostic markers for sepsis, a strongly integrated biomarker for sepsis is yet to be identified. In this study we have identified that the IMM-AGE score at day 3 post hospitalisation is higher in trauma patients that develop sepsis, revealing the potential of using this score as a valuable prognostic tool to recognise trauma patients at an increased risk of sepsis.

This study has a few limitations which should be considered when interpreting the results. Firstly, this is a single-centre observational study and these findings need to be confirmed by a large multicentre study. Secondly, the mechanisms underlying the development of an aged immune phenotype are yet to be fully elucidated and should be a focus of future pre-clinical research. Finally, we did not investigate post-trauma changes in adaptive immune functioning, only phenotype, due to the limited blood volumes collected from the participants. Future studies should carry out functional assays to confirm reduced immunity in addition to phenotypic changes in trauma patients.

Conclusions

Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in understanding the immunological impact of traumatic injury, but these studies have been largely focused on innate immune responses. This study demonstrates a state of prematurely aged immune phenotype in traumatically injured patients, potentially contributing to increased susceptibility to infections, sepsis and mortality in these patients. Using IMM-AGE scoring we can identify individuals at a higher risk of sepsis and those who would benefit the most from therapies to reduce immune ageing. Our results support the rationale for trials of anti-immune ageing interventions for reducing clinical complications in trauma patients.

Availability of data and materials

Research data generated that supports this research article will be shared upon request through a controlled access repository.

References

  1. Peden M, McGee K, Krug E. Injury: A leading cause of the global burden of disease, 2000. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henry JA, Reingold AL. Prehospital trauma system reduce mortality in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(1):261–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31824bde1e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoover L, Bochicchio GV, Napolitano LM, Joshi M, Bochicchio K, Meyer W. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and nosocomial infection in trauma. J Trauma. 2006;61(2):310–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000229052.75460.c2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ou SM, Chu H, Chao PW, Lee YJ, Kuo CS, Chen TJ, Tseng CM, Shih CJ, Chen YT. Long term mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events in sepsis survivors. A nationwide population-based study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(2):209–17. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201510-2023OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vincent JL, Pereira AJ, Gleeson J, Backer DD. Early management of sepsis. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2014;1(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.14.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gentile LF, Cuenca AG, Efron PA, Darwin A, Mc Kinley BA, Moldawer LL, Moore FA. Persistent inflammation and immunosuppression: a common syndrome and new horizon for surgical intensive care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1491–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318256e000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Duke JM, Boyd JH, Randall SM, Wood FM. Long term mortality in a population-based cohort of adolescents, and young and middle-aged adults with burn injury in Western Australia: A 33-year study. Acc Anal Prevent. 2015;85(6):118–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-018-0134-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pugin J. How tissue injury alarms the immune system and causes a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2012;2(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-2-27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lord JM, Midwinter MJ, Chen YF, Belli A, Brohi K, Kovacs EJ, Koenderman L, Kubes P, Lilford RJ. The systemic immune response to trauma: an overview of pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet. 2014;384(9952):1455–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60687-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ward NS, Casserly B, Ayala A. The compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS) in critically ill patients. Clin Chest Med. 2008;29(4):617–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2008.06.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kimura F, Shimizu H, Yoshidome H, Ohtsuka M, Miyazaki M. Immunesupression following surgical and traumatic injury. Surg Today. 2010;40(9):793–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-010-4323-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liao Y, Liu P, Guo F, Zhang ZY, Zhang Z. Oxidative burst of circulating neutrophils following traumatic brain injury in human. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hazeldine J, Dinsdale RJ, Harrison P, Lord JM. Traumatic injury and exposure to mitochondrial derived damage associated molecular patterns supresses neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Front Immunol. 2019;10:685. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Granowitz EV, Porat R, Mier JW, Orencole SF, Kaplanski G, Lynch EA, Ye K, Vannier E, Wolff SM, Dinarello CA. Intravenous endotoxin supresses the cytokine response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy humans. J Immunol. 1993;151(3):1637–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Monneret G, Lepape A, Voirin N, Bohe J, Venet F, Debard AL, Thizy H, Bienvenu J, Gueyffier F, Vanhems P. Persisting low monocyte human leukocyte antigen- DR expression predicts mortality in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(8):1175–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0204-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heffernan DS, Monaghan SF, Thakkar RK, Machan JT, Cioffi WG, Ayala A. Failure to normalize lymphopenia following trauma is associated with increased mortality, independent of the leukocytosis pattern. Crit Care. 2012;16(1):R12. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bandyopadhyay G, De A, Laudanski K, Li F, Lentz C, Bankey P, Miller-Graziano C. Negative signalling contributing to T cell anergy in trauma patients. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(3):794–801. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000256847.61085.A5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scumpia OP, Delano MJ, Scumpia KM, Weinstein JS, Wynn JL, Winfield RD, Xia C, Chung CS, Ayala A, Atkinson MA, Reeves WH, Slzler MC, Moldawer LL. Treatment with GITR agonistic antibody corrects adaptive immune dysfunction in sepsis. Blood. 2007;110(10):3673–81. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-04-087171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Duggal NA. Reversing the immune ageing clock: lifestyle modifications and pharmacological interventions. Biogerontol. 2018;19(6):481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-018-9771-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas R, Wang W, Su DM. Contributions of age-related thymic involution to immunesenescence and inflammaging. Immun Ageing. 2020;17:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-020-0173-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Callender LA, Carroll EC, Beal RWJ, Chambers ES, Nourshargh S, Akbar AN, Henson SM. Human CD8+ EMRA T cells display a senescence-associated secretory phenotype regulated by p38 MAPK. Ageing Cell. 2018;17:e12675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ouyang X, Yang Z, Zhang R, Arnaboldi R, Lu G, Li Q, Wang W, Zhang B, Cui M, Zhang H, LiangChen J, Qin L, Zheng F, Huang B, Xiong H. Potentiation of Th17 cytokines in aging process contributes to the development of colitis. Cell Immunol. 2011;266(2):208–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.10.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alpert A, Pickman Y, Leipold M, Rossenber-Hasson Y, Ji X, Gaujoux H, Rabani H, Starosvetsky E, Kveler K, Schaffert S, Furman D, Caspi O, Rosenschein U, Khatri P, Dekker CL, Maecker HT, Davis MM, Shen-Orr SS. A clinically meaningful metric of immune age derived from high-dimensional longitudinal profiling. Nature Med. 2019;25:487–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0381-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane S, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, Van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). Jama. 2016;315(8):801–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Phua J, Koay ES, Lee KH. Lactate, procalcitonin, and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide versus cytokine measurements and clinical severity scores for prognostication in septic shock. Shock. 2008;29(3):328–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0b013e318150716b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cunha DMG, Hamasaki MY. New Biomarkers of Sepsis with Clinical Relevance. Clin Manag Shock - The Sci Art Physiol Restor. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Le-Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score Based on a European/ North American study. JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957–63. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.270.24.2957.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Definitions of sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/ Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–55. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.101.6.1644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Foster MA, Taylor AE, Hill NE, Bentley C, Bishop J, Gilligan LC, Shaheen F, Bion JF, Fallowfield JL, Woods DR, Bancos I, Midwinter MM, Lord JM, Arlt W. Mapping the steroid to major trauma from injury to recovery: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(3):925–37. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Duggal NA, Upton J, Phillips AC, Hampson P, Lord JM. Depressive symptoms post hip fracture in older adults are associated with phenotypic and functional alterations in T cells. Immun Ageing. 2014;11(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-014-0025-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Duggal NA, Pollock RD, Lazarus NR, Harridge S, Lord JM. Major features of immunesenescence, including thymic atrophy are ameliorated by high levels of physical activity in adulthood. Aging Cell. 2018;17(2):e12735. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12750.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xia J, Psychogios N, Young N, Wishart DS. MetaboAnalyst: a web server for metabolomic data analysis and interpretation. Nucl Acids Res. 2009;37:652–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Haines CJ, Giffon TD, Li-Sheng L, Lu X, Tessier-Lavigne M, Ross DT, Lewis DB. Human CD4+ T cell recent thymic emigrants are identified by protein tyrosine kinase 7 and have reduced immune function. J Exp Med. 2009;206(2):275–85. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20080996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Covre LP, De Maeyer RPH, Gomes D, Akbar AA. The role of senescent T cells in immunopathology. Ageing Cell. 2020;19(12):e13272. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003;299(5609):1057–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shi Y, Agematsu K, D Ochs H, Sugane K. Functional analysis of human memory B cell subpopulation: IgD+CD27+ B cells are crucial in secondary immune response by producing high affinity IgM. Clin Immunol. 2003;108(2):128–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1521-6616(03)00092-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Blair PA, Norena YL, Flores-Borja F, Rawlings DJ, Isenberg DA, Ehrenstein MR, Mauri C. CD19(+)CD24(hi)CD38(hi) B cells exhibit regulatory capacity in healthy individuals but are functionally impaired in systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients. Immunity. 2010;32(1):129–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2009.11.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Duggal NA, Reversing the immune ageing clock,. lifestyle modifications and pharmacological interventions. Biogerontol. 2018;19(6):481–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-018-9771-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Castle SC. Clinical relevance of age-related immune dysfunction. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31(2):578–85. https://doi.org/10.1086/313947.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yousefzadeh MJ, Flores RR, Zhu Y, Schmiechen ZC, Brooks RW, Trussoni CE, Cui Y, Angelini L, Lee K, Mc Gowan SJ, Burrack AL, Dong Q, Lu A, Sano T, O’Kelly RD, McGuckian CA, Kato JI, Bank MP, Wade EA, Pillai SP, Klug J, Ladiges WC, Burd CE, Lewis SE, LaRusso NF, Vo VN, Wang Y, Kelley EE, Huard J, Stromnes IM, Robbins PD, Niedernhofer LJ. An aged immune system drives senescence and ageing of solid organs. Nature. 2021;594(7861):100–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03547-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cheadle WG, Pemberton RM, Robinson D, Livingston DH, Rodriguez JL, Polk HC Jr. Lymphocyte subset responses to trauma and sepsis. J Trauma. 1993;35(6):844–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199312000-00007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Delogu G, Moretti S, Antonucci A, Marcellini S, Masciangelo R, Famularo G, Signore L, De Simone C. Apoptosis and surgical trauma: dysregulated expression of death and survival factors on peripheral lymphocytes. Arch Surg. 2000;135(10):1141. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.135.10.114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Duggal NA, Snelson C, Shaheen U, Pearce V, Lord JM. Innate and adaptive immune dysregulation in critically ill ICU patients. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28409-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ballester JC, Pons-Castillo A, Gonzalez-Sanchez A, Llombart-Cussac A, Cane MJ, Cuellar C. Lymphopenia in hospitalised patients and its relationship with severity of illness and mortality. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0256205. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Schwulst SJ, Trahanas DM, Saber R, Perlman H. Traumatic brain injury-induced alterations in peripheral immunity. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(5):780–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318299616a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Gruver AL, Sempowski GD. Cytokines, leptin and stress induced thymic atrophy. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;84(4):915–23. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0108025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Vignali DA, Collison LW, Workman CJ. How regulatory T cells work. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(7):523–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Li M, Lin YP, Chen JL, Li H, Jiang RC, Zhang JN. Role of regulatory T cells in clinical outcome of traumatic brain injury. Chin Med J. 2015;128(8):1072–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.155094.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Neidhardt R, Keel M, Steckholzer U, Safret A, Ungethuem U, Trentz O, Ertel W. Relationship of interleukin-10 plasma levels to severity of injury and clinical outcome in injured patients. J Trauma. 1997;42(5):863–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199705000-00017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Fischer CJ, Agosti JM, Opal SM, Lowry SF, Balk RA, Slotman GJ, Iberti TJ, Rackow EC, Shapiro MJ, Grrenman RL, et al. Recombinant humn interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of patients with sepsis syndrome. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Phase II rhIL-1ra sepsis syndrome study group. JAMA. 1994;271(23):1836–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Fischer CJ, Agosti JM, Steven OM, Lowry SF, Balk RA, Sadoff JC, Abraham E, Schein RMH, Benjamin E. Treatment of septic shock with tumor necrosis factor receptor: Fc fusion protein. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(26):1697–702. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199606273342603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Justice JN, Nambiar AM, Tchkonia T, LeBrasseur NK, Pascal R, Hashmi AK, Prata L, Masternak MM, Kritchevsky SB, Musi N, Kirkland Jl. Senolytics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: results from a first-in-human, open-label, pilot study. E Bio Med. 2019;40:554–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hickson LJ, Prata LL, Bobart SA, Evans TK, Giorgadze N, Hashmi SK, Hermann SM, Jensen MD, Jia Q, Jordan KL, Kellogg TA, Khosla S, Koerber DM, Lagnado AB, Lawson DK, LeBrasseur NK, Lerman LO, McDonald KM, McKenzie TJ, Passos JF. Pignolo RJ et al Senolytics decrease senescent cells in humans: Preliminary report from a clinical trial of Dasatinib plus Quercetin in individuals with diabetic kidney disease. E Bio Med. 2019;47:446–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.08.069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Fahy GM, Brooke RT, Watson JP, Good Z, Vasanawala SS, Maecker H, Leipold MD, Lin D, Kobor MS, Horvath S. Reversal of epigenetic aging and immunosenescent trends in humans. Ageing Cell. 2019;18(6):e13028. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Hotchkiss RS, Coopersmith CM, Mc Dunn JE, Ferguson TA. The sepsis seesaw: tilting immunesupression. Nat Med. 2009;15(5):496–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0509-496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Shin GT, Jo IJ, Hwang SY, Jeon K, Suh GY, Choe E, Lee YK, Lee TR, Cha CW, Sim SM. Comprehensive interpretation of central venous oxygen saturation and blood lactate levels during resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department. Shock. 2016;45(1):4–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kim S, Lee K, Kim I, Jung S, Kim MJ. Red cell distribution width and early mortality in elderly patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015;2(3):155–61. https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.15.037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Schlattmann P, Brunkhorst FM. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(5):189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70323-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participants that have made this research possible. This work was supported by funding from the NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre. The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR or the Department for Health.

Funding

The SIR Study was part of the Surgeon General’s Casualty Nutrition Study (SGCNS), a Ministry of Defence-funded project. The analysis of the cohort was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre (SRMRC), Birmingham. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, the Medical Research Council or the Department of Health, UK. The funders provided financial support to this research but had no role in the design of the study, analysis, interpretations of the data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NIHR-Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

    Mark A. Foster & Conor Bentley

  2. Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Mark A. Foster & Conor Bentley

  3. MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Jon Hazeldine, Janet M. Lord & Niharika A. Duggal

  4. Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

    Animesh Acharjee

  5. Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    Ornit Nahman & Shai S. Shen-Orr

Authors
  1. Mark A. Foster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Conor Bentley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jon Hazeldine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Animesh Acharjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ornit Nahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shai S. Shen-Orr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Janet M. Lord
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Niharika A. Duggal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.A.F, C.B, and J.H, were responsible for the recruitment of the participants and sample processing for the study. A.A. performed the scatter forest analysis. O.H and S.S calculated the IMM-AGE scores. J.M.L, M.A.F contributed to the conceptualisation of the study and writing of the manuscript. N.A.D. performed the analyses, analysed the data, performed the statistical analysis and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript, provided feedback, and approved the manuscript in its final form.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niharika A. Duggal.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the NRES Committee South West – Frenchay 11/ SW/0177 and Ministry of Defence REC 116/Gen/10. Informed written consent has been obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

All authors provide consent for the publication of the research findings of the study. When an injured patient lacked capacity, the study team would gain advice from a ‘consultee’, personal or otherwise before entry into the study (under the terms of Sect. 32 and Sect. 33 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005). When an individual regained capacity, full informed consent was obtained from the patient before they continued in the study.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foster, M.A., Bentley, C., Hazeldine, J. et al. Investigating the potential of a prematurely aged immune phenotype in severely injured patients as predictor of risk of sepsis. Immun Ageing 19, 60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-022-00317-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-022-00317-5

Keywords

Immunity & Ageing

ISSN: 1742-4933

Contact us