Skip to main content

TBX21, the Master regulator of the type 1 immune response, overexpresses in the leukocytes of peripheral blood in patients with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract

Background

The involvement of the peripheral immune system in the etiology of neurodegenerative diseases has recently been emphasized. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have recently identified several candidate immune genes linked to development of both Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and depression. TBX21 (T-bet) which drives the Th1 immune response, is linked to the major depressive disorder (MDD) phenotype. This study investigated the association between the TBX21 immune gene and the possibility of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) incidence in 194 LOAD and 200 control subjects using the real-time qPCR and the Tetra-ARMS-PCR methods. We also used an in silico approach to analyze the potential effects imparted by TBX21 rs17244587 and rs41515744 polymorphisms in LOAD pathogenesis.

Results

We found that the TBX21 “immune gene” had significantly elevated mRNA expression levels in the leukocytes of peripheral blood in patients with LOAD (P < 0.0001). We also found an upward trend in TBX21 expression with increasing age in LOAD patients compared to the control group (P < 0.05; CI = 95%). We noticed that the TT genotype of rs41515744 plays a protective role in LOAD incidence, as it attenuates the expression of TBX21 in the control group. We observed that the dominant model of rs41515744 represented a substantial association with LOAD (P = 0.019).

Conclusions

Our results show for the first time the likely impact of the TBX21 (T-bet) immune gene in LOAD development and that the elevated TBX21 mRNAs in the WBCs of LOAD patients may represent a new easy diagnostic test for Alzheimer’s disease.

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of age-related dementia, is a type of progressive neurodegenerative disorder and one of the leading causes of mortality-related dementia worldwide [1]. The hallmarks of AD are pathological neural loss and depletion, which arise from the formation of de novo amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in synaptic and cytoplasmic regions of neurons, respectively [2]. The main manifestattion of AD is cognitive failure leading to loss of memory [2].

Late onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) often occurs in the late age of 60 s [3]. AD is a polygenic neurodegenerative disorder whose whole hereditary risk factors including related triggering signaling pathways remain to be discovered. Of the genes involved in AD pathology, the ApoE gene, is a crucial genetic cause of AD [4]. Other gene mutations that highly affect AD incidence are APP, PSEN1 & 2, SORL1, and GAB2 [5].

The vital role of the innate immune system in developing AD is known. It initiates an inflammatory response in situ that ultimately activates microglia inside the brain, leading to the release of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. The inflammatory response, therefore, seems to be a critical and powerful initiator of plaque formation in the brain, leading to neurodegeneration in LOAD [6]. In addition to the innate immune system, the involvement of peripheral immune inflammatory factors in the etiology of Alzheimer’s disease or other neurodegenerative diseases, such as major depressive disorder (MDD), has recently been addressed [7]. The inflammatory hypothesis of depression has widely been accepted by neuroscientists. The increased inflammatory activation of the immune system has been shown to play a vital role in the development of depression [8,9,10] and, the cytokine-induced neuroinflammation in major depressive disorder (MDD) has been well studied [11]. The fact that treatment of depression by antidepressants decreases inflammation in the brain strongly supports the immunopsychiatric link of depression [12]. As mentioned [7], both central (brain) and peripheral (innate) immune systems may play roles in such inflammation. A range of research already indicates that the inflammatory cytokines of macrophages in the body could reach the brain and this echo of inflammation in the brain can be linked to depression [8] and Alzheimer’s [13]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several immune candidate genes linked to the development of neurodegenerative diseases [14, 15]. Of those, the T-Box Transcription Factor 21 (TBX21) gene of the immune system functions in T lymphocytes and plays a role in NK cell maturation and functions [16]. TBX21 (also called T-bet [T-box expressed in T cells]) is located on the 17q21.32 locus in humans and belongs to the T-box transcription factor (TF) family, which in T-helper-1 lymphocytes (Th1) encodes a T-bet transcription factor that establishes Th1 differentiation and maturation [16]. T-bet can then direct T-cell homing to proinflammatory sites and stimulate Th1 cells to secrete an interferon II called INF-G that causes inflammation in the site of release [17]. The T-bet transcription factor can also inhibit the polarization of some CD4+ T-cell subsets, such as Th2 or Th17 cells [18, 19]. Various single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TBX21 affect the gene expression level of T-bet. For instance, rs4794067 of TBX21 is related to a higher risk of severity of asthma, risk of lupus erythematosus, and type 1 autoimmune hepatitis [20]. TBX21 SNPs may correlate with some neurodegenerative diseases, such as systemic sclerosis [18]. The TBX21 rs41515744, rs17244587 and rs2325717 polymorphisms have been linked to the major depressive disorder (MDD) phenotype [21]. According to this study, polymorphisms in many inflammatory-related genes including TBX21, NR3C1 are associated with the risk of major depression and antidepressant response. The function(s) of TBX21 or its various polymorphisms in neurodegenerative dementia, such as in AD, has not yet been studied. In this study, we not only studied two polymorphisms of the TBX21 gene in LOAD incidence but also measured its expression alteration in white blood cells of LOAD patients and, investigated whether the changes in TBX21 expression could link to the different genotypes of two TBX21 polymorphisms.

We have previously shown elevated mRNA expression levels of the peripheral CD33 immune gene in WBCs of patients with LOAD [22]. Here, we investigated whether the expression of the TBX21 immune gene is altered in the leukocytes of peripheral blood in LOAD patients, as it was for CD33 cases, to speculate whether it represents a LOAD-diagnosing biomarker. We then performed an in silico study to search the possible transcription factor (TF) binding sites on corresponding DNA motifs to determine which potential TF can possibly interact with the TBX21 gene to derive its expression in LOAD patient Leukocytes. We also studied the two SNPs of rs41515744 [C > T] and rs17244587 [G > A] of the TBX21 gene to find any potential correlation with them and LOAD incidence.

Results

rs41515744 and rs17244587 genotype frequency

Tetra-ARMS PCR results for rs41515744 in healthy control samples showed 177 cases with CC, 18 cases with CT, and 5 cases with TT genotypes. The mined data from LOAD samples implied 155 cases with CC, 33 cases with CT, and 6 cases with TT genotypes. The genotype distribution for the rs17244587 SNP for the healthy control individuals was 178 cases with GG, 12 cases with GA, and 10 cases with AA, while in LOAD patients, genotypes were 178 cases with GG, 6 cases with GA and 10 cases with AA. To study the frequency of various genotypes between the groups, a chi-square test was conducted. The results were as follows: F = 0.01; P = 0.96 for rs41515744 which indicates that the difference is not significant (Table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of the genotype frequencies of rs41515744 and rs17244587 polymorphisms of the TBX21 gene in LOAD patients (n = 194) and healthy control individuals (n = 200)

In the genotype data of the rs17244587 SNP, the statistical examination did not show significant correlations between the two patient and control groups (F = 0.29; P = 0.59) (Table 1).

In the next step, odd ratios (ORs) were analyzed to understand the effectiveness of rs41515744 and rs17244587 genotypes as risk factors in LOAD development. Based on the results of the OR test, the dominant model of rs41515744 represented a significant association with LOAD with a P-value of 0.019 and an OR of 1.94 [1.11–3.39]. The codominant model of inheritance was at the margin of a significant level (P = 0.044), but this cannot be a reliable significant association (Table 2).

Table 2 The association between the TBX21 rs41515744 polymorphism and LOAD (late-onset Alzheimer’s disease). P-values and ORs for the association are shown in dominant, codominant, and recessive models

For the rs17244587 polymorphism, the results showed no significant association between any models of inheritance and the risk of LOAD (P.0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3 Summary of P-values and ORs for the association between TBX21 rs17244587 and LOAD in dominant, codominant, and recessive models

rs41515744 and rs17244587 allele frequency

Statistical analysis revealed that the frequencies of major (C) and minor (T) alleles of rs41515744 in the LOAD group were 343 (84.4%) and 45 (11.6%), respectively. These allele frequencies in the control group were 372 (93%) (C) and 28 (7%) (T). The results for rs17244587 indicated that the frequencies of major (G) and minor (A) alleles were 362 (93.3%) and 26 (6.7%) in the LOAD group and 368 (97%) and 32 (3%) in the control group, respectively.

Allele frequencies showed no significant association for either rs415157442 = 0.003 and P = 0.59) or rs172445872 = 0.005 and P = 0.56) polymorphisms (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of allelic frequencies between controls and LOAD patients for rs41515744 and rs17244587 SNPs in the TBX21 gene

Increased TBX21 expression in leukocytes in the peripheral blood of LOAD patients

Unpaired t test evaluations showed a significant increase (P < 0.0001) in TBX21 expression levels in the leukocytes of peripheral blood of LOAD patients (mean values ± SDs: 2.44 ± 0.720) compared to normal healthy individuals (mean values ± SDs: 0.999 ± 0.633) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Evaluation of TBX21 mRNA expression in the blood cells of LOAD patients. Relative TBX21 mRNA expression is increased in WBCs from LOAD patients compared to those from control individuals. The total number of participants in the patient and control groups was 394. Data are normalized against GAPDH internal control. Bars represent mean values ± SDs. We used an unpaired t test to compare the different groups (****P < 0.0001)

Next, we performed the expression evaluations of different genotypes for either studied TBX21 SNP. The expression evaluation for the rs41515744 SNP in LOAD patients indicated that the CC, CT, and TT genotypes had expression levels equal to 1.41 ± 0.36, 1.63 ± 0.53, and 1.60 ± 0.22, respectively. This showed that the CT genotype had the highest level of TBX21 expression compared to the two other genotypes. The expression of different genotypes of the rs41515744 SNP in the control cohort however, showed a different pattern compared to the case subjects: the expression of the CC, CT, and TT genotypes was equal to 2.29 ± 0.37, 1.65 ± 0.22 and 0.95 ± 0.23, respectively. The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a significant relationship (P < 0.0001) between TBX21 expression in cases vs. controls for both CC, and TT genotypes whereas according to the results of Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, there was no significant relationship between CT (p > 0.05) genotypes in the two compared groups (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relative levels of TBX21 mRNAs in peripheral blood leukocyte samples of designated genotypes in a rs41515744 polymorphism for genotypes of CC (155), CT (33), and TT (6) and in b rs17244587 polymorphism for genotypes of GG (178), GA (6), and AA (10). (n = 194 in patients and n = 200 in control groups). The differences between groups are marked in the figure. The increase in TBX21 mRNA levels was higher in the C/T of the rs41515744 genotype than in the two other genotypes in the LOAD patients. The differences between LOAD and control samples in TBX21 expression of the CC and TT genotypes are shown to be significant (****P < 0.0001). The increase in TBX21 mRNA levels was higher in the G/G of the rs17244587 genotype than in the two other genotypes in the LOAD patients. The differences between LOAD and control samples in TBX21 expression of the GG and GA genotypes are shown to be significant (****P < 0.0001). Barres in box plots represent mean values ± SDs. We used a Kruskal_Wallis test to compare the different groups (****P < 0.0001). LOAD, late-onset Alzheimer’s disease

For the second polymorphism; the rs17244587 SNP, the gene expression levels of various TBX21 genotypes of GG, GA, and AA in LOAD patients were 1.69 ± 0.19, 1.25 ± 0.29, and 1.06 ± 0.12, respectively. Notably, the GG genotype of this rs has the highest expression among other genotypes. The expression of different genotypes of rs17244587 in control groups showed almost the same similar pattern compared to the case subjects. The GG, GA, and AA genotypes in controls had expression levels equal to 2.17 ± 0.20, 1.78 ± 0.23, and 0.97 ± 0.16, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant relationship (P = 0.0001) between TBX21 expression in cases vs. controls for both GG and GA genotypes. Based on the results of Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, there was no significant relationship between the AA (P > 0.05) genotype in the two compared groups (Fig. 2b).

We also analyzed the expression levels of TBX21 matching the increasing age of LOAD patients and control individuals. Interestingly, we found an upward trend in TBX21 gene expression with increasing age in LOAD patients when compared to control individuals (P < 0.05; CI = 95%). A scatter plot of the fold change expression of TBX21 versus the age of the studied population is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

TBX21 mRNA expression in peripheral blood leukocytes. Scatter plot of TBX21 mRNA expression fold change against age in LOAD patients and control individuals. Each dot represents a sample. Blue dots and red dots are representatives of patients and controls, respectively

As shown in Fig. 4, there was a significant linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the pairwise haplotypes. The LD was 90 between rs17244587 (G) and rs41515744 (C), indicating a high linkage disequilibrium (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Schematic of haplotype block- formed by rs17244587 and rs41515744 SNPs in the TBX21 locus

The results showed that GC was the most frequent haplotype (0.93%), and the rarest haplotypes were GT (0.02%) in both case and control samples (Table 5). Based on the frequency of the pairwise haplotypes in cases and controls, none of the haplotypes conferred a risk or protective factor for LOAD susceptibility.

Table 5 Linkage disequilibrium analysis of rs41515744 and rs17244587 of the TBX21 locus

In silico analysis for the rs17244587 and rs41515744 polymorphisms in the TBX21 gene

We examined 15 bp upstream and 15 bp downstream of both SNPs using the TFBIND software program (http://www.tfbind.hgc.jp/) to investigate potential TF binding sites on corresponding DNA motifs. Generally, there are 3 models of binding for TFs in the identified ranges (see Table 6): 1) TFs that only bind to the dominant model (G for rs17244587 and C for rs41515744); 2) TFs that only bind to the recessive model (A for rs17244587 and T for rs41515744), and finally, 3) TFs that bind to either dominant or recessive models (G/A for rs17244587 and C/T for rs41515744).

Table 6 In silico analysis of TBX21 rs17244587 and rs41515744 polymorphisms by the TFBIND program

The bioinformatics analyses for the studied variants indicated that rs41515744 was in the enhancer region and rs17244587 in the enhancer flanking region of the TBX21 gene (found on http://asia.ensembl.org/index.html). TFBIND results revealed that the transcription factors NGFIC, NRF2, and MYOD can bind only in the presence of the rs41515744 major allele (C), while the minor allele T can create a new binding site for p300, CAAT, and HNF3B. Moreover, transcription factors, including IK1 and SP1, can only bind when the rs17244587 major allele (G) is present and on the other hand, PAX2 and GR bind with the minor allele A.

Discussion

Late-onset Alzheimer’s disease dementia is one of the most widespread age-related neurodegenerative disorders and is triggered by genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, and inflammation [1].

In this study, we show that the TBX21 immunity gene has an overall > 2-fold elevated mRNA expression level in the leucocytes of peripheral blood in patients with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD). TBX21 has been shown to be involved in major depressive disorder (MDD) and the antidepressant response [21]. The increased expression observed to be associated with the presence of the TT genotype of the rs41515744 SNP suggests that TT is a protective factor in healthy individuals as it attenuates TBX21 expression in control groups. We also found an upward trend in TBX21 expression in LOAD patients with increasing age compared to the control group (P < 0.05; CI = 95%). On the opposite side and, inside the LOAD groups, TBX21 could have fluctuated expression, depending on different genotypes. Our results conclusively indicated that the lower TBX21 expression in LOAD patients is associated with the presence of GG and GA genotypes for rs17244587 SNP and further, the CC genotype for rs41515744 SNP. Our results also indicated that inside the studied population, there were no significant differences in either allelic or genotyping levels of rs41515744 and rs1244587. Based on the OR test results, we found that the dominant model of the rs41515744 polymorphism represents a significant association with LOAD inheritance (0.019), while the codominant model of inheritance for this rs was only at the margin of a significant level (P = 0.044). In contrast, in the rs17244587 SNP, there was no significant association between any model of inheritance and the risk of LOAD.

Recent findings indicate that a consistent in situ inflammation cascade has an enormous effect on the formation of Aβ plaques and NF tangles in both synaptic and cytoplasmic regions of neurons [2]. The triggering of “inside brain” inflammation processes, however, is not limited to the only activity of the brain’s own innate immune system. In fact, recent findings propose that such activity might also be the result of crosstalk between the internal environment of the brain and the peripheral immune system [7]. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) recently nominated several candidate “immunity genes” involved in brain inflammation and neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer’s disease [14], limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) [23], and major depressive disorder (MDD) [15]. We have previously shown that CD33, a transmembrane protein expressed on the surface of mature monocytes/macrophages [24], has strongly elevated mRNA expression levels in the leucocytes of peripheral blood in LOAD patients [22]. TBX21 of the T-box transcription factor family of T-helper-1 (Th1) lymphocytes encodes the T-bet transcription factor that directs T-cell homing to proinflammatory sites and stimulates Th1 cells to secrete INF-G to cause inflammation at the site of release [17]. The current study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to study whether there is a possible connection between LOAD risk and changes in the expression of the TBX21 inflammatory gene in peripheral leukocytes of LOAD patients. This study also investigates the possible difference in single nucleotide polymorphisms of rs41515744 and rs17244587 SNPs of the TBX21 gene in LOAD cases compared to healthy individuals. Various studies have previously demonstrated the relationship between mutations in the TBX21 gene and the development of different “immunity”-associated diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, type 1 diabetes called insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [25]. In animal models of mice, studies have revealed that the TBX21 Th1-specific transcription factor affects the expression of various cytokines, especially INFγ [26]. Iinflammation has a crucial role in the formation of AD-related plaques and, INFγ is one of the most effective inflammatory factors whose chronic secretion stimulates inflammatory reactions by Th1 lymphocytes leading to tissue damage and degeneration as well as fibrosis [27]. Parnell GP and colleagues investigated the gene expression level of two distinct transcription factors encoded by TBX21 and EOMES genes in T- and NK cells in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Their finding indicates that the expression level of both genes is decreased in MS patients’ T- and NK cells [26]. Our results, however, showed a > 2-fold increase in TBX21 transcript levels in WBCs from LOAD patients. The TBX21 gene has remarkable polymorphisms based on the SNP database of NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/?term=TBX21). Gourh P et al. assessed independent data for the rs11650354 SNP of the TBX21 gene in 902 systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients compared to 4745 controls. Their results showed that the TT genotype of the TBX21 gene had a recessive pattern for susceptibility to the SSc [28]. In addition, SSc patients with the CC genotype had higher expression levels of IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (Th2), leading to altered cytokine balance and immune dysregulation compared to their control counterpart group. Gene expression profile analyses also revealed anomalies in interferon-I expression pathways in T cells for CC and TT genotypes of this SNP in SSc patients [28].

Depressive symptoms are common in Alzheimer’s patients and occur in approximately 20–30% of AD cases [29]. Depression is a serious disorder that affects approximately 300 million people worldwide. It could worsen existing medical conditions and increase functional disability [29, 30]. Clinical evidence suggests that depression might be related to AD status [31, 32], but it is not clear whether depression is a risk factor for AD, an early symptom of neurodegeneration, or a reaction to early cognitive impairment [32, 33]. Some findings suggest that depressive symptoms immediately follow the onset of AD rather than precede it [34]. Other authors suggest that the presence of depression in patients with AD raises the risk of behavioral disorders and accelerates functional decline [35]. Huden et al. reported that depression is the most consistent risk factor associated with behavioral or psychological symptoms and cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s patients [36]. Furthermore, several studies have concluded that depression at the end of life is associated with an increased risk of all causes of dementia, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease [37, 38], and late-life depression has been consistently associated with a twofold higher risk for dementia [39].

The team of Wong ML, in 2008, discovered the correlation between depression and two SNPs of rs17244587 in TBX21 and rs2296840 in PSMB4 genes in the American-Mexican population [21]. They found that having alleles with high-risk factors such as AA in rs17244587 or TT in rs2296840 will increase the risk of the development of major depressive disorder (MDD) [21]. As mentioned, LOAD patients often develop symptoms of depression. Very recently, Lutz MW et al. studied the genetic mechanisms underlying Alzheimer’s disease and major depressive disorder and suggested that MDD can be considered a prognosis of LOAD development [40]. Consistent with their results, we interestingly observed higher TBX21 mRNA expression in leukocytes of LOAD patients than in control individuals. We also observed the higher TBX21 mRNA expression was associated with the AA genotype of rs17244587 in LOAD patients, although this difference was not statistically significant. Due to the differences in TBX21 mRNA expression between patients and controls and to achieve a more precise view of the potential impacts influenced by rs17244587 and rs41515744 polymorphisms in TBX21 expression in AD patients, we performed in silico subanalysis for additional investigation of the aforementioned polymorphisms. As will follow, our analysis indicates that a number of transcription factors (TFs) can bind to the site of rs17244587 and, rs41515744 polymorphisms to activate or inhibit transcription of TBX21 in the presence of G, A, or G/A alleles for rs17244587 and C, T, or C/T alleles for rs41515744. This may indicate that the TBX21 “depressive” gene could play a role in the pathogenicity of AD from a molecular view:

Prior studies have demonstrated that SP1, p300, and NRF2 have an impact on AD [41,42,43]. Citron BA et al. previously found increased expression of the transcription factor Sp1 in Alzheimer’s patient brains, implying that transcription factors might be involved in disease pathogenesis [44]. In addition to its function in upregulating APP, Sp1 also controls COX-2, which can impact on how APP is processed and how amyloid is formed [45, 46]. Based on their results, patients with the GG genotype showed the highest rate of expression, which may be related to the binding site of the G allele compared to the lack of SP1 binding affinity in the presence of the A allele as the minor allele. It can be concluded that individuals with AA genotypes have a kind of protection against AD. NRF2 may prevent or delay the onset and progression of AD via different pathways, and drugs that activate NRF2 might be effective treatments for AD [42]. P300 may be responsive to the decline in language, memory, and executive abilities that have been seen in AD patients, according to Lee MS et al. [32]. Lee and his colleagues’ findings imply that P300 measures may be employed as physiologic indicators of diminished cognitive abilities in AD patients [43]. According to our current results, which showed that individuals with the CT genotype had the highest expression level, both NRF2 and p300 could bind to the region of rs41515744 in a regulatory role. This can be interpreted as a dual role of the heterozygote genotype as the protector and inducer of AD. The CC genotype had the lowest rate of expression, indicating the protective role of FRF2.

Conclusion

Collectively, our results show for the first time, the likely impact of the TBX21 (T-bet) immune gene in late-onset Alzheimer’s’ disease development and that the elevated TBX21 transcripts in the leucocytes of peripheral blood in LOAD patients may represent a new easy diagnostic test for Alzheimer’s disease. An in silico study revealed that few transcription factors can potentially bind in the presence of either major or minor alleles of both rs41515744 and rs17244587 studied SNPs of the TBX21 gene in LOAD cases. However, we know this conclusion is not a direct finding of this study. This study was powered at 80% with a significance level of 5% confidence and a more extensive population analysis may give a more conclusive result. With the sample size used in this study, our result violates the assumption of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for the distribution of genotypes in both case and control groups, which indicates the limitation of this study. This violation may indicate a genotype misclassification of polymorphism results however, this would not affect the innovative finding of this study i.e. the overall overexpression of the TBX21 immune gene in the leucocytes of peripheral blood in LOAD patients compared to healthy individuals.

Methods

Participant recruitment and sample preparation

Eligibility criteria for the study population were set to the individuals older than 65, which subsequently were divided into two groups of patients with LOAD and healthy individuals matched for age and gender. Both LOAD and healthy individuals were diagnosed and identified by their physicians. A neurologist further double-examined each individual who preliminary was diagnosed with LOAD by a physician. The diagnosis of LOAD was performed based on the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria (doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939). A total of 194 patients with LOAD (female:male, 136:58) and 200 control individuals (female:male, 139:51) were enrolled in this case-control study. The patients’ mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 77.94 ± 8.642, ranging from 65 to 88 years. Controls with a mean age of 82.73 ± 8.395 years (ranging from 65 to 95 years) were non-AD diagnosed and healthy individuals. Patients and control individuals diagnosed with non-AD cognitive impairment, Parkinson’s disease, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes were excluded from this study. All participants were of Persian ethnicity from or residing in northern Iran provinces; mostly from Guilan province. The blood samples were taken during 2 years of collection between December 2020 and December 2022 from several Disable and Elderly Hospice centers, mostly located in Rasht, the Guilan province’s capital. This study was approved by the University of Medical Sciences of Guilan’s Ethics Committee with international ID NO: IR.GUMS.REC.1399.427. A 5 ml peripheral blood sample of each individual with LOAD and/or healthy people was collected from several Disable and Elderly Hospice centers or elsewhere in Guilan Province, Rasht, Iran. All participants or their representatives provided informed consent. The blood samples were transferred to anticoagulant-containing EDTA K3 Venoject™ tubes (Sinaclon, Iran) by venipuncture procedure for further use.

DNA isolation, total RNA extraction, and cDNA synthesis

Genomic DNA from the whole white blood cells (WBCs) of peripheral blood of individuals was extracted using Triton® X-100 reagent (Merck, Germany) by the salting out standard method. Purified genomic DNA was stored at −20 °C until use. The extracted DNAs were used as templates for the TBX21 genotyping study.

On the same day of sampling, total RNA from peripheral blood leukocytes of individuals was extracted using TRIzol™ Reagent (Invitrogen, USA). The concentration and purity of extracted RNAs were evaluated by a NanoDrop device (Thermo Scientific, USA) at A260 and A280 nm wavelength ratios. The quality and integrity of RNAs were tested and approved by running RNA samples on gel electrophoresis. All RNAs were treated with DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) to ensure that there was no trace of potential genomic DNA contamination. cDNA synthesis (RT_PCR) was carried out by a cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Scientific, USA) using 2 µg of total RNA, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The rest of all the DNAs/synthesized cDNA and RNA were stored at -20°C and -80°C, respectively, for further use.

Tetra-ARMS PCR and genotyping of SNPs

TBX21 SNP genotyping was performed by multiplex amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (Tetra-ARMS PCR). Two sets of inner and outer primers were precisely designed using Oligo7 software (v7. 56) presented in Table 7. Thereupon, all designed primers were tested on the platform of the NCBI primer BLAST tool to ensure that primers are specific and that no unintended PCR products will be amplified. All pairs of primers were synthesized by Metabion (Metabion International AG, Germany).

Table 7 Designed primer sequences for rs41515744 [C > T] and rs17244587 [G > A]

The specific primers for rs41515744 were a combination of Fouter + Rinner amplifying the normal allele of C with a product length of 185 bp and Fouter + Rinner amplifying the mutation of the T allele with a final product length of 297 bp. Additionally, the outer forward and reverse primers amplified the full TBX21 selected region with a product length of 424 bp. In addittion, the specific primers of rs17244587 were a combination of ROuter + Finner as well as Fouter + Rinner which amplify the normal G allele of 281 bp and mutant A allele of 384 bp, respectively. The combination of forward and reverse primers copies a 611 bp region of the gene.

All amplification reactions were run with a final volume of 25 µL reaction mixtures composed of a Master mix (Ampliqon, Denmark) of 12 µL, 1 µL of each primer, 5 µL of DNA template, and DEPC-treated water (4 µL). Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, MJ Mini, USA) program was set to initial denaturation (95°C- 5 min) followed by 40 cycles of a 3-step amplification program which consisted of denaturation (95°C- 45 secs), annealing (59°C for rs17244587 and 65°C for rs41515744 primers- 50 secs) and extension (72°C- 45 s) and settled by a final extension (72°C- 5 min) to avoid the synthesis of moiety nonspecific strands. Subsequently, electrophoresis was carried out via 2% agarose gel containing SafeStainTM and a DNA ladder (SinaColon, Iran).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and gene expression

The real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) method was conducted in triplicate sample repeats in a final volume of 20 µL mixture including 10 µL of SYBR green PCR Master mix (Ampliqon, no ROX, Denmark), 1 µL of each forward and revers primer (with a concentration of 5 pmol/µL each), 1 µL of template cDNA (with an adjusted concentration of samples on 1 µg) and 7 µL of DEPC-treated water. The cycling conditions for the thermocycler (Roche, LightCycler 96, Germany) program were set up to one cycle of 96 °C for 10 min followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. All primers were designed again using Oligo7 software (v7. 56) and tested in the NCBI primer BLAST tool. An internal GAPDH control was used to measure the relative expression of the TBX21 gene in each sample (Table 8). All pairs of primers were synthesized by Metabion (Metabion International AG, Germany). The annealing temperatures for all primers were obtained and optimized via the gradient PCR method in prestudy pilot testing. Eventually, the relative fold change in expression of the target TBX21 and internal control (GAPDH) genes was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt cycle threshold method.

Table 8 Designed primer sequences for TBX21 and GAPDH genes

Statistical analysis

To examine the association between the TBX21 polymorphisms and LOAD development, obtained results from ARMS-PCR were statistically analyzed to achieve chi-square (χ2), odds ratio (OR), P-value, and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) using WEB-Assotest (available at: http://ekstroem.com:3838/webassotest/). Analyses were also performed for dominant, codominant, recessive, and overdominant genetic models. Differences in allele frequency levels between age and gender were assessed by an independent t test and, a one-way ANOVA test that was used to evaluate the association between gender and age at genotype frequency levels. Significance was adjusted to P-values less than 0.05. Correspondingly, GraphPad/Prism software (v8.0.2) was used to apply student t tests on the qPCR data as well as one-way ANOVA for evaluations of various genotypes in each SNP. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis was performed using Haploview (v4.2). The haplotype block for LD analysis has consisted of rs41515744 and rs17244587.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article, however, any supplementary material/data files can additionally be obtained from the corresponding author, Farzam Ajamian, Ph.D. Any other further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Balin BJ, Hudson AP. Etiology and pathogenesis of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014;14:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mucke L. Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2009;461(7266):895–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vilatela MEA, López-López M, Yescas-Gómez P. Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Med Res. 2012;43(8):622–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. St George-Hyslop PH, Petit A. Molecular biology and genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. C R Biol. 2005;328(2):119–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aydin D, Weyer SW, Müller UC. Functions of the APP gene family in the nervous system: insights from mouse models. Exp Brain Res. 2012;217:423–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eikelenboom P, Veerhuis R, Van Exel E, Hoozemans JJM, Rozemuller AJM, van Gool WA. The early involvement of the innate immunity in the pathogenesis of lateonset Alzheimer’s disease: neuropathological, epidemiological and genetic evidence. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011;8(2):142–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bettcher BM, Tansey MG, Dorothée G, Heneka MT. Peripheral and central immune system crosstalk in Alzheimer disease—a research prospectus. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(11):689–701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbott A. Depression: the radical theory linking it to inflammation. Nature. 2018;557(7706):633–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Felger JC, Lotrich FE. Inflammatory cytokines in depression: neurobiological mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Neuroscience. 2013;246:199–229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gałecki P, Talarowska M. Inflammatory theory of depression. Psychiatr Pol. 2018;52(3):437–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dey A, HankeyGiblin PA. Insights into macrophage heterogeneity and cytokine-induced neuroinflammation in major depressive disorder. Pharmaceuticals. 2018;11(3):64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee C-H, Giuliani F. The role of inflammation in depression and fatigue. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Abbott A. The brain inflamed. Nature. 2018;556(7702):426–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jansen IE, Savage JE, Watanabe K, Bryois J, Williams DM, Steinberg S, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nat Genet. 2019;51(3):404–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kao C-F, Jia P, Zhao Z, Kuo P-H. Enriched pathways for major depressive disorder identified from a genome-wide association study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012;15(10):1401–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanhere A, Hertweck A, Bhatia U, Gokmen MR, Perucha E, Jackson I, et al. T-bet and GATA3 orchestrate Th1 and Th2 differentiation through lineage-specific targeting of distal regulatory elements. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harigai M, Kawamoto M, Hara M, Kubota T, Kamatani N, Miyasaka N. Excessive production of IFN-gamma in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and its contribution to induction of B lymphocyte stimulator/B cell-activating factor/TNF ligand superfamily-13B. J Immunol. 2008;181(3):2211–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Szabo SJ, Kim ST, Costa GL, Zhang X, Fathman CG, Glimcher LH. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell. 2000;100(6):655–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oestreich KJ, Weinmann AS. T-bet employs diverse regulatory mechanisms to repress transcription. Trends Immunol. 2012;33(2):78–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fyall KM, Fong AM, Rao SB, Ibrahim JG, Waxweiler WT, Thomas NE. The TBX21 transcription factor T-1993C polymorphism is associated with decreased IFN-gamma and IL-4 production by primary human lymphocytes. Hum Immunol. 2012;73(6):673–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wong M, Dong C, Maestre-Mesa J, Licinio J. Polymorphisms in inflammation related genes are associated with susceptibility to major depression and antidepressant response. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13(8):800–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Heidari F, Ansstas G, Ajamian F. CD33 mRNA has elevated expression levels in the leukocytes of peripheral blood in patients with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Gerontology. 2022;68(4):421–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shibata N, Ohnuma T, Baba H, Arai H. Genetic association analysis between TDP-43 polymorphisms and Alzheimer’s disease in a Japanese population. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(4):325–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang T, Yu J-T, Hu N, Tan M-S, Zhu X-C, Tan L. CD33 in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;49:529–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. You Y, Zhao W, Chen S, Tan W, Dan Y, Hao F, et al. Association of TBX21 gene haplotypes in a Chinese population with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol. 2010;39(3):254–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Parnell GP, Gatt PN, Krupa M, Nickles D, McKay FC, Schibeci SD, et al. The autoimmune disease-associated transcription factors EOMES and TBX21 are dysregulated in multiple sclerosis and define a molecular subtype of disease. Clin Immunol. 2014;151(1):16–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mack M. Inflammation and fibrosis. Matrix Biol. 2018;68–69:106–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gourh P, Agarwal SK, Divecha D, Assassi S, Paz G, Arora-Singh RK, et al. Polymorphisms in TBX21 and STAT4 increase the risk of systemic sclerosis: evidence of possible gene-gene interaction and alterations in Th1/Th2 cytokines. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(12):3794–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsuno N, Homma A. What is the association between depression and Alzheimer’s disease? Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9(11):1667–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Organization WH. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. World Health Organization; 2017. WHO/MSD/MER/2017.2.

  31. Lyketsos CG, Tune LE, Pearlson G, Steele C. Major depression in Alzheimer’s disease: an interaction between gender and family history. Psychosomatics. 1996;37(4):380–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cantón-Habas V, Rich-Ruiz M, Romero-Saldaña M, Carrera-González MDP. Depression as a risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Biomedicines. 2020;8(11):457.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kuo C-Y, Stachiv I, Nikolai T. Association of late life depression,(non-) modifiable risk and protective factors with dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: literature review on current evidences, preventive interventions and possible future trends in prevention and treatment of dementia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gatz JL, Tyas SL, St. John P, Montgomery P. Do depressive symptoms predict Alzheimer’s disease and dementia? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(6):744–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tapiainen V, Hartikainen S, Taipale H, Tiihonen J, Tolppanen A-M. Hospital-treated mental and behavioral disorders and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a nationwide nested case-control study. Eur Psychiatry. 2017;43:92–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hudon C, Escudier F, De Roy J, Croteau J, Cross N, Dang-Vu TT, et al. Behavioral and psychological symptoms that predict cognitive decline or impairment in cognitively normal middle-aged or older adults: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2020;30:558–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kuring J, Mathias J, Ward L. Risk of dementia in persons who have previously experienced clinically-significant depression, anxiety, or PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2020;274:247–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Diniz BS, Butters MA, Albert SM, Dew MA, Reynolds CF. Late-life depression and risk of vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based cohort studies. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202(5):329–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gao Y, Huang C, Zhao K, Ma L, Qiu X, Zhang L, et al. Retracted: Depression as a risk factor for dementia and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;28(5):441–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lutz MW, Sprague D, Barrera J, Chiba-Falek O. Shared genetic etiology underlying Alzheimer’s disease and major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10(1):88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Santpere G, Nieto M, Puig B, Ferrer I. Abnormal Sp1 transcription factor expression in Alzheimer disease and tauopathies. Neurosci Lett. 2006;397(1–2):30–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Qu Z, Sun J, Zhang W, Yu J, Zhuang C. Transcription factor NRF2 as a promising therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radical Biol Med. 2020;159:87–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee M-S, Lee S-H, Moon E-O, Moon Y-J, Kim S, Kim S-H, et al. Neuropsychological correlates of the P300 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;40:62–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Citron BA, Dennis JS, Zeitlin RS, Echeverria V. Transcription factor Sp1 dysregulation in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci Res. 2008;86(11):2499–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Xu Q, Ji Y-S, Schmedtje JF. Sp1 increases expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in hypoxic vascular endothelium: implications for the mechanisms of aortic aneurysm and heart failure. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(32):24583–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Xiang Z, Ho L, Yemul S, Zhao Z, Pompl P, Kelley K, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 promotes amyloid plaque deposition in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Gene Expr. 2002;10(5–6):271–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the volunteers who participated in this study.

Funding

This work, which was defined under two MSc study projects, was supported in part by the Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences at the University of Guilan. There were no additional/external funding sources to support this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FA, the supervisor of this project, designed the project, defined the approaches, and interpreted the obtained data; SRFL and MZ equally performed all parts of this study, including performing the main experimental parts, and made major contributions to the preparation of this manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Ajamian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study with all the protocols used, was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guilan University of Medical Science with International ID reference NO: IR.GUMS.REC.1399.427.

Consent for publication

All patients and control subjects or their guardians provided written informed consent, however, no individual person’s data, i.e., specific name or ID were collected (or archived).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatemi Langroudi, S.R., Zeinaly, M. & Ajamian, F. TBX21, the Master regulator of the type 1 immune response, overexpresses in the leukocytes of peripheral blood in patients with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Immun Ageing 20, 59 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-023-00385-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-023-00385-1

Keywords